ArticlePloS one2020
Development of SSR markers in Paeonia based on De Novo transcriptomic assemblies.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative plastome analyses and phylogenetic insights ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- De Novo Transcriptome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- De novo transcriptomic analysis and identification of EST-SSR markers in Stephanandra incisa.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Development and Application of EST-SSR Markers inFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Research Progress and Future Development Trends in Medicinal Plant Transcriptomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peony is a famous ornamental and medicinal plant in China, and peony hybrid breeding is an important means of germplasm innovation. However, research on the genome of this species is limited, thereby hindering the genetic and breeding research on peony. In the present study, simple sequence repeat (SSR) locus analysis was performed on expressed sequence tags obtained by the transcriptome sequencing of Paeonia using Microsatellite software. Primers with polymorphism were obtained via polymerase chain reaction amplification and electrophoresis. As a result, a total of 86,195 unigenes were obtained by assembling the transcriptome data of Paeonia. Functional annotations were obtained in seven functional databases including 49,172 (Non-Redundant Protein Sequence Database: 57.05%), 38,352 (Nucleotide Sequence Database: 44.49%), 36,477 (Swiss Prot: 42.32%), 38,905 (Clusters of Orthologous Groups for Eukaryotic Complete Genomes: 45.14%), 37,993 (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes: 44.08%), 26,832 (Gene Ontology: 31.13%) and 37,758 (Pfam: 43.81%) unigenes. Meanwhile, 21,998 SSR loci were distributed in 17,567 unigenes containing SSR sequences, and the SSR distribution frequency was 25.52%, with an average of one SSR sequence per 4.66 kb. Mononucleotide, dinucleotide, and trinucleotide were the main repeat types, accounting for 55.74%, 25.58%, and 13.21% of the total repeat times, respectively. Forty-five pairs of the 100 pairs of primers selected randomly could amplify clear polymorphic bands. The polymorphic primers of these 45 pairs were used to cluster and analyze 16 species of peony. The new SSR molecular markers can be useful for the study of genetic diversity and marker-assisted breeding of peony.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.