Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31999709›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Coral restoration - A systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions.

Lisa Boström-Einarsson, Russell C Babcock, Elisa Bayraktarov, Daniela Ceccarelli, Nathan Cook, Sebastian C A Ferse, Boze Hancock, Peter Harrison, Margaux Hein, Elizabeth Shaver and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Success of restoration strategies in preventing extirpation of 2 critically endangered coral species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trait-based approaches to restoration ecology: Synthesizing insights from diverse systems.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lisa Boström-EinarssonTropWATER, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4814-9552
Russell C BabcockCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Elisa BayraktarovUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Daniela CeccarelliMarine Ecology Consultant, Magnetic Island, Qld, Australia.
Nathan CookReef Ecologic, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
Sebastian C A FerseFuture Earth Coasts, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0930-5356
Boze HancockThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Peter HarrisonSouthern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Margaux HeinTropWATER, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
Elizabeth ShaverThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Adam SmithReef Ecologic, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
David SuggettUniversity of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Phoebe J Stewart-SinclairUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Tali VardiECS for NOAA Fisheries, Office of Science & Technology, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Ian M McLeodTropWATER, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reef ecosystems have suffered an unprecedented loss of habitat-forming hard corals in recent decades. While marine conservation has historically focused on passive habitat protection, demand for and interest in active restoration has been growing in recent decades. However, a disconnect between coral restoration practitioners, coral reef managers and scientists has resulted in a disjointed field where it is difficult to gain an overview of existing knowledge. To address this, we aimed to synthesise the available knowledge in a comprehensive global review of coral restoration methods, incorporating data from the peer-reviewed scientific literature, complemented with grey literature and through a survey of coral restoration practitioners. We found that coral restoration case studies are dominated by short-term projects, with 60% of all projects reporting less than 18 months of monitoring of the restored sites. Similarly, most projects are relatively small in spatial scale, with a median size of restored area of 100 m2. A diverse range of species are represented in the dataset, with 229 different species from 72 coral genera. Overall, coral restoration projects focused primarily on fast-growing branching corals (59% of studies), and report survival between 60 and 70%. To date, the relatively young field of coral restoration has been plagued by similar 'growing pains' as ecological restoration in other ecosystems. These include 1) a lack of clear and achievable objectives, 2) a lack of appropriate and standardised monitoring and reporting and, 3) poorly designed projects in relation to stated objectives. Mitigating these will be crucial to successfully scale up projects, and to retain public trust in restoration as a tool for resilience based management. Finally, while it is clear that practitioners have developed effective methods to successfully grow corals at small scales, it is critical not to view restoration as a replacement for meaningful action on climate change.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsAnthozoaClimate ChangeConservation of Natural Resources

Identifiers

PMID31999709
PMCPMC6992220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.