Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31999695›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Reassessing therapeutic antibodies for neglected and tropical diseases.

Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen, Somei Kojima, Dee Carter, Hisafumi Okabe, Akihide Sato, Wataru Akahata, Timothy N C Wells, Kei Katsuno

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Monoclonal antibody applications in travel medicine.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic Antibodies: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. BCG vaccine: a hope to control COVID-19 pandemic amid crisis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Rob Hooft van HuijsduijnenMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2261-9424
Somei KojimaChiba-Nishi General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Dee CarterSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences and The Marie Bashir Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4638-0059
Hisafumi OkabeChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Akihide SatoChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Wataru AkahataVLP Therapeutics, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Timothy N C WellsMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kei KatsunoGlobal Health Innovative Technology Fund, Tokyo, Japan.
Medicines for Malaria Venture · CHChiba-Nishi General Hospital · JPGlobal Health Innovative Technology Fund · JPThe University of Sydney · AUVLP Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades there has been a significant expansion in the number of new therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that are approved by regulators. The discovery of these new medicines has been driven primarily by new approaches in inflammatory diseases and oncology, especially in immuno-oncology. Other recent successes have included new antibodies for use in viral diseases, including HIV. The perception of very high costs associated with mAbs has led to the assumption that they play no role in prophylaxis for diseases of poverty. However, improvements in antibody-expression yields and manufacturing processes indicate this is a cost-effective option for providing protection from many types of infection that should be revisited. Recent technology developments also indicate that several months of protection could be achieved with a single dose. Moreover, new methods in B cell sorting now enable the systematic identification of high-quality antibodies from humanized mice, or patients. This Review discusses the potential for passive immunization against schistosomiasis, fungal infections, dengue, and other neglected diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalDengueDrug DevelopmentHumansImmunization, PassiveMiceMycosesNeglected DiseasesSchistosomiasisTropical MedicineAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID31999695
PMCPMC6991954
OpenAlexW3004146881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.