Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31999645›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2020

Genetic modification increases the survival and the neuroregenerative properties of transplanted neural stem cells.

Irina Korshunova, Sina Rhein, Diego García-González, Ines Stölting, Ulrich Pfisterer, Anna Barta, Oksana Dmytriyeva, Agnete Kirkeby, Markus Schwaninger, Konstantin Khodosevich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. OPTRACE: Optical Imaging-Guided Transplantation and Tracking of Cells in the Mouse Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Brain repair mechanisms after cell therapy for stroke.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Irina KorshunovaBiotech Research & Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sina RheinInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Diego García-GonzálezBiotech Research & Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ines StöltingInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Ulrich PfistererBiotech Research & Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna BartaBiotech Research & Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oksana DmytriyevaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences.
Agnete KirkebyDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus SchwaningerInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Konstantin KhodosevichBiotech Research & Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Lübeck · DENovo Nordisk Foundation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy raises hopes high for better treatment of brain disorders. However, the majority of transplanted cells often die soon after transplantation, and those that survive initially continue to die in the subacute phase, diminishing the impact of transplantations. In this study, we genetically modified transplanted human neural stem cells (hNSCs), from 2 distant embryonic stem cell lines (H9 and RC17), to express 1 of 4 prosurvival factors - Hif1a, Akt1, Bcl-2, or Bcl-xl - and studied how these modifications improve short- and long-term survival of transplanted hNSCs. All genetic modifications dramatically increased survival of the transplanted hNSCs. Importantly, 3 out of 4 modifications also enhanced the exit of hNSCs from the cell cycle, thus avoiding aberrant growth of the transplants. Bcl-xl expression provided the strongest protection of transplanted cells, reducing both immediate and delayed cell death, and stimulated hNSC differentiation toward neuronal and oligodendroglial lineages. By designing hNSCs with drug-controlled expression of Bcl-xl, we demonstrated that short-term expression of a prosurvival factor can ensure the long-term survival of transplanted cells. Importantly, transplantation of Bcl-xl-expressing hNSCs into mice suffering from stroke improved behavioral outcome and recovery of motor activity in mice.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsbcl-X ProteinCell CycleCell SurvivalHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMotor ActivityNeural Stem CellsStrokeTreatment OutcomeBCL2L1 protein, humanbcl-X ProteinApoptosisNeuronal stem cellsNeuroscienceStem cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID31999645
PMCPMC7101138
OpenAlexW3003836888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.