Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31999565›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2020

A sensitive period in the neural phenotype of language in blind individuals.

Rashi Pant, Shipra Kanjlia, Marina Bedny

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Extended Language Network: Language-Responsive Brain Areas Whose Contributions to Language Remain To Be Discovered.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Face shape processingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rashi PantDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: rashi.pant@uni-hamburg.de.
Shipra KanjliaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Marina BednyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Visual cortex plasticity in blindness: a window into flexibility of human cortexR01EY027352 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEDNY, MARINA · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital blindness modifies the neural basis of language: "visual" cortices respond to linguistic information, and fronto-temporal language networks are less left-lateralized. We tested the hypothesis that this plasticity follows a sensitive period by comparing the neural basis of sentence processing between adult-onset blind (AB, n = 16), congenitally blind (CB, n = 22) and blindfolded sighted adults (n = 18). In Experiment 1, participants made semantic judgments for spoken sentences and, in a control condition, solved math equations. In Experiment 2, participants answered "who did what to whom" yes/no questions for grammatically complex (with syntactic movement) and simpler sentences. In a control condition, participants performed a memory task with non-words. In both experiments, visual cortices of CB and AB but not sighted participants responded more to sentences than control conditions, but the effect was much larger in the CB group. Only the "visual" cortex of CB participants responded to grammatical complexity. Unlike the CB group, the AB group showed no reduction in left-lateralization of fronto-temporal language network, relative to the sighted. These results suggest that congenital blindness modifies the neural basis of language differently from adult-onset blindness, consistent with a developmental sensitive period hypothesis.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultBlindnessFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeSemanticsAdult-onset blindnessLanguage developmentSensitive periods

Identifiers

PMID31999565
PMCPMC6994632
OpenAlexW2992078211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.