Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31999169›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology2020

Narrative video scene description task discriminates between levels of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease.

Stephanie Reeves, Victoria Williams, Francisco M Costela, Rocco Palumbo, Olivia Umoren, Mikaila M Christopher, Deborah Blacker, Russell L Woods

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. An implementation of Bubble Magnification did not improve the video comprehension of individuals with central vision loss.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie ReevesSchepens Eye Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-8451
Victoria WilliamsMassachusetts General Hospital.
Francisco M CostelaSchepens Eye Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-3530-6224
Rocco PalumboSchepens Eye Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-2385-5840
Olivia UmorenGerontology Research Unit.ORCID 0000-0001-6707-2066
Mikaila M ChristopherGerontology Research Unit.ORCID 0000-0002-8791-4133
Deborah BlackerGerontology Research Unit.ORCID 0000-0001-6107-7376
Russell L WoodsSchepens Eye Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-7193-1211

Funding

THE ROLE OF ADVANCED CAA IN ALZHEIMER'S DEMENTIAP50AG005134 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HYMAN, BRADLEY T. · 1985 to 2018
$42.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STEVEN E ARNOLD · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
VISION RESEARCHP30EY003790 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Patricia Ann D'Amore · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Watching Television and Movies with Low VisionR01EY019100 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WOODS, RUSSELL LAURENCE · 2010 to 2016
$3.5M
Impact of Peripheral Islands in the Visual Field on Functional Ability in Patients with Retinitis PigmentosaR21EY027882 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WOODS, RUSSELL LAURENCE · 2017 to 2018
$561k
Improvements to gaze-contingent visual display systemsR21EY023724 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WOODS, RUSSELL LAURENCE · 2014 to 2015
$537k
Fidelity BiosciencesNEI NIH HHS P30 EY003790NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019100NEI NIH HHS R21 EY023724NEI NIH HHS R21 EY027882NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005134NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of interpreting and acting upon the visual environment requires both intact cognitive and visual systems. The narrative description (ND) task, initially developed to detect changes in ecologically relevant visual function in people with impaired vision, is an objective measure of the ability to perceive, understand, and describe a visual scene in a movie clip.

objectiveBecause the ND task draws heavily on semantic and working memory ability in addition to basic visual perception, we aimed to assess the discriminative performance of this task across levels of cognitive impairment.

methodWe recruited 56 participants with cognitive status ranging from normal cognition to mild dementia (median age 82, range 66 to 99 years) to watch 20 30-s video clips and describe the visual content without time constraints. These verbal responses were transcribed and processed to generate ND shared word scores using a "wisdom of the crowd," natural-language processing approach. We compared ND scores across diagnostic groups, and used linear mixed models to examine decrements in task performance.

resultsThere was a stepwise decline of ND scores with increasing levels of cognitive impairment. Additional analyses showed that ND performance was highly related to performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and domain-specific neuropsychological tests for semantic fluency and set shifting. Other models demonstrated differences in ND performance related video content between cognitively normal and impaired participants.

conclusionThe ND test was able to detect decrements in task performance between levels of cognitive impairment and was related to other global neuropsychological measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMental Status and Dementia TestsNarrationNatural Language ProcessingNeuropsychological TestsVideo RecordingVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID31999169
PMCPMC7182468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.