ArticleNeuropsychology2020
Exploratory examination of lexical and neuroanatomic correlates of neglect dyslexia.
Article in Neuropsychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Spatial Neglect in Chronic Right Hemisphere Stroke Survivors Using the RHDBank Outcomes.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Dissociating reading and auditory comprehension in persons with aphasia.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Systematic evaluation of high-level visual deficits and lesions in posterior cerebral artery stroke.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Prism Adaptation Treatment Improves Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcome in Individuals With Spatial Neglect: A Retrospective Matched Control Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Rehabilitation Care of Individuals With Spatial Neglect: A Qualitative Study of Professional Views.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined lexical and neuroanatomic correlates of reading errors in individuals with spatial neglect, defined as a failure to respond to stimuli in the side of space opposite a brain lesion, causing functional disability.
methodOne-hundred and ten participants with left spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke read aloud a list of 36 words. Reading errors were scored as "contralesional" (error in the left half of the word) or as "other." The influence of lexical processing on neglect dyslexia was studied with a stepwise regression using word frequency, orthographic neighborhood (number of same length neighbors that differ by 1 letter), bigram and trigram counts (number of words with the same 2- and 3-letter combinations), length, concreteness, and imageability as predictors. MRI/CT images of 92 patients were studied in a voxelwise lesion-symptom analysis (VLSM).
resultsLonger length and more trigram neighbors increased, while higher concreteness reduced, the rate of contralesional errors. VLSM revealed lesions in the inferior temporal sulcus, middle temporal and angular gyri, precuneus, temporal pole, and temporo-parietal white matter associated with the rate of contralesional errors.
conclusionsOrthographic competitors may decrease word salience, while semantic concreteness may help constrain the selection of available word options when it is based on degraded information from the left side of the word. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.