Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31999012›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2020

Associations of perceived information adequacy and knowledge with pursuit of live donor kidney transplants and living donor inquiries among African American transplant candidates.

Ashley N Cabacungan, Matthew J Ellis, Debra Sudan, Tara S Strigo, Iris Pounds, Jennie A Riley, Margaret Falkovic, Aviel N Alkon, Sarah B Peskoe, Clemontina A Davenport and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Determinants and Consequences of Living Donor Discussion Direction.Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ashley N CabacunganDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew J EllisDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Debra SudanDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Tara S StrigoDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Iris PoundsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennie A RileyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Margaret FalkovicDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Aviel N AlkonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah B PeskoeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Clemontina A DavenportDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jane F PendergastDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Patti L EphraimWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Baltimore, Maryland.
Dinushika MohottigeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5099-4910
Clarissa J DiamantidisDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer St Clair RussellDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Nicole DePasqualeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
L Ebony BoulwareDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-8650-4212

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
DUKE TRAINING GRANT IN NEPHROLOGYT32DK007731 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CROWLEY, STEVEN D · 1995 to 2021
$3.6M
Transplant Social Worker Support for Live Kidney Donation in African AmericansR01DK098759 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Information and Financial Interventions for Kidney Donation in African AmericansR01DK079682 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079682NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098759NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied associations between perceived adequacy of live donor kidney transplant (LDKT) information or knowledge with pursuit of LDKT or receipt of live donor inquiries among 300 African American kidney transplant candidates. Participants reported via questionnaire how informed or knowledgeable they felt regarding LDKT. Participants also reported their pursuit of LDKT, categorized as "low" (no discussion with family or friends about LDKT and no identified donor), "intermediate" (discussed LDKT with family but no identified donor) or "high" (discussed LDKT with family and identified a potential donor). We reviewed participants' electronic health records to identify potential donors' transplant center inquiries on participants' behalves. A minority of participants reported they felt "very" or "extremely" well informed about LDKT (39%) or had "a great deal" of LDKT knowledge (38%). Participants perceiving themselves as "very" or "extremely" (vs "not" or "slightly") well informed about LDKT had statistically significantly greater odds of intermediate or high (vs low) pursuit of LDKT (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.71 [1.02-7.17]). Perceived LDKT knowledge was not associated with pursuit of LDKT. Neither perceived information adequacy nor knowledge was associated with living donor inquiries. Efforts to better understand the role of education in the pursuit of LDKT among African American transplant candidates are needed.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationLiving DonorsBlack or African AmericanHumansSurveys and Questionnairesdonors and donationdonors and donation: livingeducationkidney transplantation: living donorpatient education

Identifiers

PMID31999012
PMCPMC7135970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.