Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31998962›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology (Oxford, England)2020

Is background methotrexate advantageous in extending TNF inhibitor drug survival in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis? An analysis of the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register.

Katie Bechman, Anuoluwapo Oke, Mark Yates, Sam Norton, Elaine Dennison, Andrew P Cope, James B Galloway

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie BechmanCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, LondonUK.
Anuoluwapo OkeCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, LondonUK.
Mark YatesCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, LondonUK.
Sam NortonPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, UK.
Elaine DennisonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Andrew P CopeCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, LondonUK.
James B GallowayCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, LondonUK.
King's College - North Carolina · USKing's College London · GBMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate drug survival with monotherapy compared with combination therapy with MTX in RA older adults.

methodsPatients from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, a prospective observational cohort, who were biologic naïve and commencing their first TNF inhibitors (TNFi) were included. The cohort was stratified according to age: <75 and ≥75. Cox-proportional hazards models compared the risk of TNFi discontinuation from (i) any-cause, (ii) inefficacy and (iii) adverse events, between patients prescribed TNFi-monotherapy compared with TNFi MTX combination.

resultsThe analysis included 15 700 patients. Ninety-five percent were <75 years old. Comorbidity burden and disease activity were higher in the ≥75 cohort. Fifty-two percent of patients discontinued TNFi therapy during the follow-up period. Persistence with therapy was higher in the <75 cohort. Patients receiving TNFi monotherapy were more likely to discontinue compared with patients receiving concomitant MTX [hazard rate 1.12 (1.06-1.18) P <0.001]. This finding only held true in patients <75 [hazard rate (HR) 1.11 (1.05-1.17) vs ≥75 [HR 1.13 (0.90-1.41)]. Examining TNFi discontinuation by cause revealed patients ≥75 receiving TNFi monotherapy were less likely to discontinue TNFi due to inefficacy [HR 0.66 (0.43-0.99) P=0.04] and more likely to discontinue therapy from adverse events [HR 1.41(1.02-1.96) P =0.04]. These results were supported by the multivariate adjustment in complete case and imputed analyses.

conclusionTNFi monotherapy is associated with increased treatment failure. In older adults, the disadvantage of TNFi monotherapy on drug survival is no longer seen. Patients ≥75 have fewer discontinuations due to inefficacy than adverse events compared with younger patients. This likely reflects greater disposition to toxicity but perhaps also a decline in immunogenicity associated with immunosenescence.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsDrug MonitoringDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMethotrexateTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAgedAge FactorsAntirheumatic AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunosenescenceMaleRegistriesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsMethotrexateTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsanti-TNF therapybiologicsepidemiologymethotrexaterheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID31998962
PMCPMC7449803
OpenAlexW3003812743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.