ArticleBrain communications2020
Relationship of amyloid-β1-42 in blood and brain amyloid: Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory Study.
Article in Brain communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Cognitive Changes Among Patients over 65 Years of Age in a Rural Area-The Preliminary Report of Protective and Predisposing Factors.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Generative artificial intelligence, integrative bioinformatics, and single-cell analysis reveal Alzheimer's genetic and immune landscape.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Association Between β-Amyloid Accumulation and Incident Dementia in Individuals 80 Years or Older Without Dementia.Neurology · 2024Article
- Air pollution and plasma amyloid beta in a cohort of older adults: Evidence from the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory study.Environment international · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Blood-Based Plasma Biomarkers as Potential Markers of Amyloid Burden in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
- Biomarkers of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Biology, Taxonomy, Clinical Relevance, and Current Research Status.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Nanoparticle-Enabled Enrichment of Longitudinal Blood Proteomic Fingerprints in Alzheimer's Disease.ACS nano · 2021Article
- Prediction of Cerebral Amyloid Pathology Based on Plasma Amyloid and Tau Related Markers.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- In the blood: biomarkers for amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease.Brain communications · 2020Article
- Predicting continuous amyloid PET values with CSF and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A blood test that predicts the extent of amyloid plaques in the brain and risk of Alzheimer's disease would have important benefits for the early identification of higher risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease and the evaluation of new preventative therapies. The goal of this study was to determine whether plasma levels of amyloid-β1-42, 1-40 and the amyloid-β1-42/1-40 ratio among participants in the Pittsburgh centre of the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory Study were related to the extent of brain fibrillar amyloid plaques measured in 2009 using Pittsburgh compound-B PET imaging, hippocampal volume, cortical thickness in the temporal lobe and white matter lesions. There were 194 participants who had Pittsburgh compound-B measurements in 2009 with the mean age of 85 years; 96% were white and 60% men. Pittsburgh compound-B positivity was defined as a standardized uptake value ratio of ≥1.57. Amyloid-β in blood was measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay developed by Eli Lilly and modified at the University of Vermont. All participants were nondemented as of 2008 at the time of study close out. The study sample included 160 with blood samples drawn in 2000-02 and 133 from 2009 and also had brain amyloid measured in 2009. All blood samples were analysed at the same time in 2009. Plasma amyloid-β1-42 was inversely related to the percent Pittsburgh compound-B positive (standardized uptake value ratio ≥1.57),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.