Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31998701›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019

From Isolation of Phosphate Solubilizing Microbes to Their Formulation and Use as Biofertilizers: Status and Needs.

Abdoulaye Soumare, Kenza Boubekri, Karim Lyamlouli, Mohamed Hafidi, Yedir Ouhdouch, Lamfeddal Kouisni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Studies on the Phosphorus-Solubilizing Ability ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Genomics analysis of three phosphorus-dissolving bacteria isolated from Torreya grandis soil.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdoulaye SoumareAgroBioSciences Program, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Benguerir, Morocco.
Kenza BoubekriAgroBioSciences Program, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Benguerir, Morocco.
Karim LyamlouliAgroBioSciences Program, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Benguerir, Morocco.
Mohamed HafidiAgroBioSciences Program, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Benguerir, Morocco.
Yedir OuhdouchAgroBioSciences Program, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Benguerir, Morocco.
Lamfeddal KouisniAgroBioSciences Program, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Benguerir, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of biofertilizers at industrial level is a bottleneck because bacterial strains are generally developed and managed by research laboratories and not by production units. A seamless transition from laboratory to field application is, therefore necessary. This review provides an overview of the constraints that limiting the application or the implementation of

Indexed as

Actinobacteria biotechnologybioformulationphosphorousquality standardsrock phosphate

Identifiers

PMID31998701
PMCPMC6962098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.