ArticleFrontiers in public health2019
National Working Group on the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Goals, Resources, and Future Directions.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the use and reporting of evaluation frameworks within evaluations of physical activity interventions.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020Pooled it
- Exploring implementation and sustainability of a community paramedicine model to reduce hospitalizations: a pragmatic randomized trial.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- The feasibility of conducting non-pharmacological research studies in participants with mania: a grounded theory qualitative analysis of the Ottawa Sunglasses at Night study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Trial
- Community coalition and key stakeholder perceptions of the community opioid epidemic before an intensive community-level intervention.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022Trial
- Measuring uptake of the 2024 national standards for survivorship care: Insights from National Cancer Institute funded pilot projects.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Healthy Cities initiative: A scoping review of process evaluations.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026Article
- PeriOperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definitions, aims and delivery of shared decision-making for major surgery.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- A Mobile Exhibition to Advance Cancer Prevention Awareness: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Health in Cardio Oncology, from Evidence To Action: Translating Concepts into Clinical Practice Through Implementation Science.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Expert insights into public health nutrition challenges: a rapid group model building demonstration workshop.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- A Human-Centred Co-Design Framework for Developing a Web-Based Platform to Engage With Rural Australian Communities: Addressing the Complex Issue of Healthy Food Access.The Australian journal of rural health · 2025Article
- IM4Equity: an implementation science meta-framework for community-engaged partnerships to advance health equity.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A 5-year examination of CAPABLE implementation using RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Improving the usability of online resources to support implementation research and practice: The RE-AIM website use case.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Stakeholder Perceptions of the Acceptability of Peer-Mediated Intervention for Minimally Speaking Preschoolers on the Autism Spectrum.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Article
- Evaluating adoption and reach in a pragmatic randomized trial of community paramedicine for intermediate acuity patient care.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- RE-AIM for rural health innovations: perceptions of (mis) alignment between the RE-AIM framework and evaluation reporting in the Department of Veterans Affairs Enterprise-Wide Initiatives program.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Mixed-method approach to informing a lifestyle intervention to improve the survivorship of patients with endometrial cancer.Gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- The iPRISM webtool: an interactive tool to pragmatically guide the iterative use of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model in public health and clinical settings.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of three implementation measures into Brazilian-Portuguese.Archives of physiotherapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Working Group on RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework (herein Workgroup) was established in 2004 to support the application of the framework and advance dissemination and implementation science (D&I). Workgroup members developed and disseminated products and resources (and continue to do so) to advocate for consistent application of RE-AIM and allow for cross study comparisons. The purpose of this paper is to summarize key Workgroup activities, products, and services (e.g., webinars, consultations, planning tools) and enhance bidirectional communication between the Workgroup and RE-AIM users. The ultimate goal of this work is to serve as a forum for dissemination to improve the balance between RE-AIM user demand (needs) and the currently limited RE-AIM Workgroup supply (consultation and resources) to demonstrate and expand the utility of RE-AIM as a D&I planning and evaluation framework. A summary of resources is provided as well as specific examples of how the Workgroup has been responsive to user needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.