ArticlePeerJ2020
Differentially expressed genes and key molecules of
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network based analysis identifies TP53m-BRCA1/2wt-homologous recombination proficient (HRP) population with enhanced susceptibility to Vigil immunotherapy.Cancer gene therapy · 2022Trial
- Article
- Multi-omics integration and machine learning uncover molecular basal-like subtype of pancreatic cancer and implicate A2ML1 in promoting tumor epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Missense mutations of GPER1 in breast invasive carcinoma: Exploring gene expression, signal transduction and immune cell infiltration with insights from cellular pharmacology.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Exploring Prognostic Gene Factors in Breast Cancer via Machine Learning.Biochemical genetics · 2024Article
- Gender-Specific Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer:Cancers · 2024Review
- Robust Identification of Differential Gene Expression Patterns from Multiple Transcriptomics Datasets for Early Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapies for Breast Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Integrated multi-omics analyses and functional validation reveal TTK as a novel EMT activator for endometrial cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- A2ML1 Inhibits Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression and Serves as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Transcriptome Patterns ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Regulatory Factors and Immune-Associated Patterns to Decipher Common andFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsGene expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were downloaded and combined with cBioPortal website to identify exact breast cancer patients with
resultsThe regulation process of cell cycle was significantly enriched in mutant group compared with wild-type group. A total of 294 genes were identified after analysis of DEGs between mutant patients and wild-type patients. Interestingly, by the other two comparisons, we identified 43 overlapping genes that not only significantly expressed in wild-type breast cancer patients relative to normal tissues, but more significantly expressed in
conclusionOur research provides comprehensive and new insights for the identification of biomarkers connected with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.