ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2019
Use of three pins in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.
Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe present our institutional experience in treating brain metastases with GK-SRS and a headframe fixed to the skull with only 3 pins to avoid collisions between the headframe and the Gamma Knife (GK) machine. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among 3500 consecutive patients who received GK-SRS in 2011-2017, 50 had 1 of the 2 anterior pins removed immediately before treatment of ≥1 brain lesion. Endpoints were local control, dosimetric parameters, and toxicity.
resultsMedian follow-up time for the 49 patients with follow-up was 7.0 months (range 0.2-57.0). Median number of lesions treated per session was 6 (range 1-18); a median 1 lesion was treated with 3-pin fixation (range 1-2) and a median 5 lesions treated with 4-pin fixation (range 0-17) during the same session. Lesions treated with 3-pin fixation were in the occipital lobe (n=41), cerebellum (n=9), or temporal lobe (n=1). No local failures were noted. The sole grade 2 toxicity (partial seizure) was attributed to treatment of a 4-pin-fixed lesion. Except for gradient index, dosimetry did not vary for lesions treated with 3-pin versus 4-pin fixation.
conclusionsTreating brain metastases with 3-pin fixation did not compromise treatment outcome and is a good option for posterior brain metastases that cannot otherwise be treated with 4-pin GK-SRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31998541PMC6774483W3028567646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.