Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31998413›Full record

ArticleStudies in mycology2019

The root-symbiotic

J Fehrer, M Réblová, V Bambasová, M Vohník

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in mycology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A review and case study ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fungal Planet description sheets: 1614-1696.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J FehrerInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
M RéblováInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
V BambasováInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
M VohníkInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data mining for a phylogenetic study including the prominent ericoid mycorrhizal fungus

Indexed as

EctomycorrhizaEricoid mycorrhizaHyaloscypha bicolor (Hambl. & Sigler) Vohník, Fehrer & RéblováHyaloscypha finlandica (C.J.K. Wang & H.E. Wilcox) Vohník, Fehrer & RéblováHyaloscypha hepaticicolaHyaloscypha melinii Vohník, Fehrer & RéblováHyaloscypha variabilis (Hambl. & Sigler) Vohník, Fehrer & RéblováHyaloscypha vraolstadiae (Hambl. & Sigler) Vohník, Fehrer & RéblováHymenoscyphus ericaeMeliniomycesMolecular systematicsMycorrhizal synthesisPezoloma ericaePseudaegeritaSexual-asexual connection

Identifiers

PMID31998413
PMCPMC6976342
OpenAlexW2895847612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.