Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31998356›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2019

Genomic Epidemiology in Filarial Nematodes: Transforming the Basis for Elimination Program Decisions.

Shannon M Hedtke, Annette C Kuesel, Katie E Crawford, Patricia M Graves, Michel Boussinesq, Colleen L Lau, Daniel A Boakye, Warwick N Grant

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Procedure for Handling and Storage ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  14. AssessingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Shannon M HedtkeDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Annette C KueselUnicef/UNDP/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Katie E CrawfordDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Patricia M GravesCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
Michel BoussinesqUnité Mixte Internationale 233 "TransVIHMI", Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), INSERM U1175, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Colleen L LauDepartment of Global Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Daniel A BoakyeParasitology Department, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Accra, Ghana.
Warwick N GrantDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
La Trobe University · AUAustralian National University · AUInserm · FRJames Cook University · AUNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research · GHSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis are targeted for elimination, primarily using mass drug administration at the country and community levels. Elimination of transmission is the onchocerciasis target and global elimination as a public health problem is the end point for lymphatic filariasis. Where program duration, treatment coverage, and compliance are sufficiently high, elimination is achievable for both parasites within defined geographic areas. However, transmission has re-emerged after apparent elimination in some areas, and in others has continued despite years of mass drug treatment. A critical question is whether this re-emergence and/or persistence of transmission is due to persistence of local parasites-i.e., the result of insufficient duration or drug coverage, poor parasite response to the drugs, or inadequate methods of assessment and/or criteria for determining when to stop treatment-or due to re-introduction of parasites

Indexed as

drug resistanceepidemiologylymphatic filariasisonchocerciasisparasite eliminationpopulation genomicstransmission

Identifiers

PMID31998356
PMCPMC6964045
OpenAlexW2991436161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.