Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31998103›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

The Application of EEG Mu Rhythm Measures to Neurophysiological Research in Stuttering.

David Jenson, Andrew L Bowers, Daniel Hudock, Tim Saltuklaroglu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An active inference account of stuttering behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring EEG Responses during Observation of Actions Performed by Human Actor and Humanoid Robot.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aberrant modulation of broadband neural oscillations reflects vocal sensorimotor deficits in post-stroke aphasia.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Stuttering: A Disorder of Energy Supply to Neurons?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David JensonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Andrew L BowersEpley Center for Health Professions, Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Daniel HudockDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, United States.
Tim SaltuklarogluCollege of Health Professions, Department of Audiology and Speech-Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Idaho State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USWashington State University Spokane · US

Funding

Real-time differences in sensorimotor integration for speech perception between stuttering and non-stuttering populationsR21DC014506 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SALTUKLAROGLU, TIM · 2015 to 2016
$418k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deficits in basal ganglia-based inhibitory and timing circuits along with sensorimotor internal modeling mechanisms are thought to underlie stuttering. However, much remains to be learned regarding the precise manner how these deficits contribute to disrupting both speech and cognitive functions in those who stutter. Herein, we examine the suitability of electroencephalographic (EEG) mu rhythms for addressing these deficits. We review some previous findings of mu rhythm activity differentiating stuttering from non-stuttering individuals and present some new preliminary findings capturing stuttering-related deficits in working memory. Mu rhythms are characterized by spectral peaks in alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (14-25 Hz) frequency bands (mu-alpha and mu-beta). They emanate from premotor/motor regions and are influenced by basal ganglia and sensorimotor function. More specifically, alpha peaks (mu-alpha) are sensitive to basal ganglia-based inhibitory signals and sensory-to-motor feedback. Beta peaks (mu-beta) are sensitive to changes in timing and capture motor-to-sensory (i.e., forward model) projections. Observing simultaneous changes in mu-alpha and mu-beta across the time-course of specific events provides a rich window for observing neurophysiological deficits associated with stuttering in both speech and cognitive tasks and can provide a better understanding of the functional relationship between these stuttering symptoms. We review how independent component analysis (ICA) can extract mu rhythms from raw EEG signals in speech production tasks, such that changes in alpha and beta power are mapped to myogenic activity from articulators. We review findings from speech production and auditory discrimination tasks demonstrating that mu-alpha and mu-beta are highly sensitive to capturing sensorimotor and basal ganglia deficits associated with stuttering with high temporal precision. Novel findings from a non-word repetition (working memory) task are also included. They show reduced mu-alpha suppression in a stuttering group compared to a typically fluent group. Finally, we review current limitations and directions for future research.

Indexed as

basal gangliainternal modelsmu rhythmsensorimotor integrationspeech perceptionspeech productionstutteringworking memory

Identifiers

PMID31998103
PMCPMC6965028
OpenAlexW3000425168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.