ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2019
Errors and Action Monitoring:
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sharing errors with human and non-human agents.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Post-error slowing during motor sequence learning under extrinsic and intrinsic error feedback conditions.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Error monitoring when no errors are possible: Arbitrary free-choice decisions invoke error monitoring processes.iScience · 2023Article
- Preserved electrophysiological markers of confidence in schizophrenia spectrum disorder.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Detecting Anosognosia from the Prodromal Stage of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
- Dynamical EEG Indices of Progressive Motor Inhibition and Error-Monitoring.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- On the Comparison Between the Nc/CRN and the Ne/ERN.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- A Dissociation of Attention, Executive Function and Reaction to Difficulty: Development of the MindPulse Test, a Novel Digital Neuropsychological Test for Precise Quantification of Perceptual-Motor Decision-Making Processes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It was recognized long ago by Seneca through his famous "
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.