ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Digital Noise Reduction Processing on Subjective and Objective (Pupillometry) Assays of Listening Effort.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Article
- Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech.Brain research · 2024Article
- Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Continuous dynamics in behavior reveal interactions between perceptual warping in categorization and speech-in-noise perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Phonological discrimination and contrast detection in pupillometry.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.Brain research · 2021Article
- Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Quantifying the Effect of Noise on Cognitive Processes: A Review of Psychophysiological Correlates of Workload.Noise & healthReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human perception requires the many-to-one mapping between continuous sensory elements and discrete categorical representations. This grouping operation underlies the phenomenon of categorical perception (CP)-the experience of perceiving discrete categories rather than gradual variations in signal input. Speech perception requires CP because acoustic cues do not share constant relations with perceptual-phonetic representations. Beyond facilitating perception of unmasked speech, we reasoned CP might also aid the extraction of target speech percepts from interfering sound sources (i.e., noise) by generating additional perceptual constancy and reducing listening effort. Specifically, we investigated how noise interference impacts cognitive load and perceptual identification of unambiguous (i.e., categorical) vs. ambiguous stimuli. Listeners classified a speech vowel continuum (/u/-/a/) at various signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs [unmasked, 0 and -5 dB]). Continuous recordings of pupil dilation measured processing effort, with larger, later dilations reflecting increased listening demand. Critical comparisons were between time-locked changes in eye data in response to unambiguous (i.e., continuum endpoints) tokens vs. ambiguous tokens (i.e., continuum midpoint). Unmasked speech elicited faster responses and sharper psychometric functions, which steadily declined in noise. Noise increased pupil dilation across stimulus conditions, but not straightforwardly. Noise-masked speech modulated peak pupil size (i.e., [0 and -5 dB] > unmasked). In contrast, peak dilation latency varied with both token and SNR. Interestingly, categorical tokens elicited earlier pupil dilation relative to ambiguous tokens. Our pupillary data suggest CP reconstructs auditory percepts under challenging listening conditions through interactions between stimulus salience and listeners' internalized effort and/or arousal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.