Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31998017›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Adductor canal block: Effect of volume of injectate on sciatic extension.

Khaireddine Raddaoui, Mohamed Radhouani, Abderahmen Bargaoui, Oussama Nasri, Karima Zoghlami, Emna Trigui, Olfa Kaabachi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress on analgesic effect of adductor canal block after knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Khaireddine RaddaouiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kassab Orthopaedic Institute, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Mohamed RadhouaniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kassab Orthopaedic Institute, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Abderahmen BargaouiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kassab Orthopaedic Institute, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Oussama NasriDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kassab Orthopaedic Institute, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Karima ZoghlamiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kassab Orthopaedic Institute, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Emna TriguiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kassab Orthopaedic Institute, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Olfa KaabachiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kassab Orthopaedic Institute, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Tunis El Manar University · TNFaculté de médecine de TunisTunis University · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSpread of local anesthetic within adductor canal to peroneal and tibial nerves is described in literature. This spread could be volume-dependent.

aimsIn this study, we compared the diffusion of two volumes of 0.375% ropivacaine to popliteal fossa. SETTINGS AND

designThis was a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blind study conducted in Kassab Orthopaedic Institute of Tunis for 1 year (2018). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 42 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II scheduled for knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia scheduled to receive adductor canal block, were randomized into two groups: group N received 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% and group H received 40 mL. We evaluated sensory motor blocks of both peroneal and tibial nerves at 30 and 60 min. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the number and percentage.

resultsAt 60 min, complete sensory block of the peroneal nerve was obtained for 16 patients in group H versus 15 patients in group N with no statistically significant difference (

conclusionSpread of 0.375% ropivacaine to popliteal fossa resulted in high rate of complete sensory blockade of both peroneal and tibial nerves. Diffusion of local anesthetic was not volume-dependent.

Indexed as

Adductor canal blockknee arthroscopymotor blockperoneal nervesensory blocktibial nerve

Identifiers

PMID31998017
PMCPMC6970348
OpenAlexW3000535746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.