ArticleSarcoma2020
Radiomics and Machine Learning Differentiate Soft-Tissue Lipoma and Liposarcoma Better than Musculoskeletal Radiologists.
Article in Sarcoma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics in musculoskeletal imaging: what is its role in the era of deep learning?Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Automated detection of primary soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities using artificial intelligence and ChatGPT.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Gastrocnemius-soleus intramuscular lipoma misinterpreted as hemangioma: a rare case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Has Varied Diagnostic and Predictive Performance in Diagnosing Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis, Trochlear Dysplasia, and Patellofemoral Tracking Abnormalities: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Evaluating shear wave elastography for differentiating lipomas from low to intermediate grade liposarcomas: is it reproducible and reliable?Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- An Explainable Radiomics-Based Classification Model for Sarcoma Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Differentiation of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas: Our Experience with Visual Analysis of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of MRI-based convolutional neural networks in soft tissue sarcomas: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Multi-center external validation of an automated method segmenting and differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors from lipomas using radiomics and deep-learning on MRI.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Effects of Interobserver Segmentation Variability and Intensity Discretization on MRI-Based Radiomic Feature Reproducibility of Lipoma and Atypical Lipomatous Tumor.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for the imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Review
- How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging.Radiology · 2024Review
- MRI radiomics-based machine learning for classification of deep-seated lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor of the extremities.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Tumor-to-bone distance and radiomic features on MRI distinguish intramuscular lipomas from well-differentiated liposarcomas.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Robustness of Radiomic Features: Two-Dimensional versus Three-Dimensional MRI-Based Feature Reproducibility in Lipomatous Soft-Tissue Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Increasing differential diagnosis between lipoma and liposarcoma through radiomics: a narrative review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Review
- The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Review
- The diagnosis, classification, and treatment of sarcoma in this era of artificial intelligence and immunotherapy.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022Review
- Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning.European radiology experimental · 2022Article
- Lipomatous Tumors: A Comparison of MRI-Reported Diagnosis with Histological Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distinguishing lipoma from liposarcoma is challenging on conventional MRI examination. In case of uncertain diagnosis following MRI, further invasive procedure (percutaneous biopsy or surgery) is often required to allow for diagnosis based on histopathological examination. Radiomics and machine learning allow for several types of pathologies encountered on radiological images to be automatically and reliably distinguished. The aim of the study was to assess the contribution of radiomics and machine learning in the differentiation between soft-tissue lipoma and liposarcoma on preoperative MRI and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a machine-learning model compared to musculoskeletal radiologists. 86 radiomics features were retrospectively extracted from volume-of-interest on T1-weighted spin-echo 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla MRI of 38 soft-tissue tumors (24 lipomas and 14 liposarcomas, based on histopathological diagnosis). These radiomics features were then used to train a machine-learning classifier to distinguish lipoma and liposarcoma. The generalization performance of the machine-learning model was assessed using Monte-Carlo cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC-AUC). Finally, the performance of the machine-learning model was compared to the accuracy of three specialized musculoskeletal radiologists using the McNemar test. Machine-learning classifier accurately distinguished lipoma and liposarcoma, with a ROC-AUC of 0.926. Notably, it performed better than the three specialized musculoskeletal radiologists reviewing the same patients, who achieved ROC-AUC of 0.685, 0.805, and 0.785. Despite being developed on few cases, the trained machine-learning classifier accurately distinguishes lipoma and liposarcoma on preoperative MRI, with better performance than specialized musculoskeletal radiologists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.