Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997887›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2020

The world woodlouse flies (Diptera, Rhinophoridae).

Pierfilippo Cerretti, Davide Badano, Silvia Gisondi, Giuseppe Lo Giudice, Thomas Pape

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The genome sequence of a woodlouse fly,Wellcome open research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pierfilippo CerrettiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies 'Charles Darwin', Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale A. Moro 5, I-00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-3352
Davide BadanoDISTAV, University of Genoa, Corso Europa 26, I-16132, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9715-3107
Silvia GisondiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies 'Charles Darwin', Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale A. Moro 5, I-00185, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe Lo GiudiceCUFA, Raggruppamento Carabinieri Biodiversità, Verona, Italy.
Thomas PapeNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-0609
University of Copenhagen · DKParco Nazionale d'Abruzzo · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world Rhinophoridae are catalogued, recognising 33 genera and 177 species. Nomenclatural information is provided for all genus-group and species-group names, including lists of synonyms and name-bearing type data. Species distributions are recorded by country. A key to the world genera is presented. Four new genera are erected to accommodate five new species, which do not fit within any of the current generic concepts in Rhinophoridae, according to the results of a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis:

Indexed as

Cataloguecladistic analysisclassificationdistributionnew taxaOestroideaparasitoidssystematicszoological nomenclature

Identifiers

PMID31997887
PMCPMC6976704
OpenAlexW3000705106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.