ReviewNeural regeneration research2020
Modification of tubular chitosan-based peripheral nerve implants: applications for simple or more complex approaches.
Review in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functionalization of Two-Component Gelatinous Peptide/Reactive Oligomer Hydrogels with Small Molecular Amines for Enhanced Cellular Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Harnessing three-dimensional porous chitosan microsphere embedded with adipose-derived stem cells to promote nerve regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Longitudinally aligned inner-patterned silk fibroin conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration.In vitro models · 2023Article
- Chitosan Scaffolds as Microcarriers for Dynamic Culture of Human Neural Stem Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Carbohydrate based biomaterials for neural interface applications.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2022Review
- A 'Relay'-Type Drug-Eluting Nerve Guide Conduit: Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Drug Eluting Efficiency of Various Drug Release Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- PVDF and P(VDF-TrFE) Electrospun Scaffolds for Nerve Graft Engineering: A Comparative Study on Piezoelectric and Structural Properties, and In Vitro Biocompatibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Biocompatibility and biosafety of butterfly wings for the clinical use of tissue-engineered nerve grafts.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Safety and efficacy of a nerve matrix membrane as a collagen nerve wrapping: a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Gold and Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticles Modified Poly-Propylene Poly-Ethylene Glycol Membranes in Poly (ε-Caprolactone) Conduits Enhance Nerve Regeneration in the Sciatic Nerve of Healthy Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Modified Hyaluronic Acid-Laminin-Hydrogel as Luminal Filler for Clinically Approved Hollow Nerve Guides in a Rat Critical Defect Size Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Chitosan Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles to Provide Neural Regeneration and Recovery after Experimental Model Induced Peripheral Nerve Injury.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Fabrication and Characterization of Polycaprolactone/Chitosan-Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Implants for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Polymers · 2021Article
- All-Polymer Printed Low-Cost Regenerative Nerve Cuff Electrodes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical treatment of peripheral nerve injuries is still a major challenge in human clinic. Up to now, none of the well-developed microsurgical treatment options is able to guarantee a complete restoration of nerve function. This restriction is also effective for novel clinically approved artificial nerve guides. In this review, we compare surgical repair techniques primarily for digital nerve injuries reported with relatively high prevalence to be valuable attempts in clinical digital nerve repair and point out their advantages and shortcomings. We furthermore discuss the use of artificial nerve grafts with a focus on chitosan-based nerve guides, for which our own studies contributed to their approval for clinical use. In the second part of this review, very recent future perspectives for the enhancement of tubular (commonly hollow) nerve guides are discussed in terms of their clinical translatability and ability to form three-dimensional constructs that biomimick the natural nerve structure. This includes materials that have already shown their beneficial potential in in vivo studies like fibrous intraluminal guidance structures, hydrogels, growth factors, and approaches of cell transplantation. Additionally, we highlight upcoming future perspectives comprising co-application of stem cell secretome. From our overview, we conclude that already simple attempts are highly effective to increase the regeneration supporting properties of nerve guides in experimental studies. But for bringing nerve repair with bioartificial nerve grafts to the next level, e.g. repair of defects > 3 cm in human patients, more complex intraluminal guidance structures such as innovatively manufactured hydrogels and likely supplementation of stem cells or their secretome for therapeutic purposes may represent promising future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.