Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997720›Full record

ArticleUltrasonic imaging2020

Neural-network-based Motion Tracking for Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography: An Initial Assessment of Performance and Feasibility.

Bo Peng, Yuhong Xian, Quan Zhang, Jingfeng Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonic imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lagrangian deformation tracking for strain imaging.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. MixTURE: L1-Norm-Based Mixed Second-Order Continuity in Strain Tensor Ultrasound Elastography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Displacement Estimation in ARFI Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bo PengSchool of Computer Science, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yuhong XianSchool of Computer Science, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Quan ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jingfeng JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8812-6246

Funding

Elastography-based Analytics for Benign and Malignant Breast DiseaseR15EB026197 · NIBIB · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, JINGFENG · 2018 to 2018
$450k
NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB026197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate tracking of tissue motion is critically important for several ultrasound elastography methods. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using three published convolution neural network (CNN) models built for optical flow (hereafter referred to as CNN-based tracking) by the computer vision community for breast ultrasound strain elastography. Elastographic datasets produced by finite element and ultrasound simulations were used to retrain three published CNN models: FlowNet-CSS, PWC-Net, and LiteFlowNet. After retraining, the three improved CNN models were evaluated using computer-simulated and tissue-mimicking phantoms, and in vivo breast ultrasound data. CNN-based tracking results were compared with two published two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking methods: coupled tracking and GLobal Ultrasound Elastography (GLUE) methods. Our preliminary data showed that, based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, the improvements due to retraining were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all three CNN models. We also found that the PWC-Net model was the best neural network model for data investigated, and its overall performance was on par with the coupled tracking method. CNR values estimated from in vivo axial and lateral strain elastograms showed that the GLUE algorithm outperformed both the retrained PWC-Net model and the coupled tracking method, though the GLUE algorithm exhibited some biases. The PWC-Net model was also able to achieve approximately 45 frames/second for 2D speckle tracking data investigated.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerBreastComputer SimulationElasticity Imaging TechniquesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography, Mammarybreast ultrasoundmotion trackingneural networkspeckle trackingstrain elastographyultrasound elastography

Identifiers

PMID31997720
PMCPMC8011868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.