Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997262›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2020

Longitudinal study of rotavirus C VP6 genotype I6 in diarrheic piglets up to 1 week old.

Joice Elaine Teixeira Campanha, Flávia Possatti, Elis Lorenzetti, Daniel de Almeida Moraes, Alice Fernandes Alfieri, Amauri Alcindo Alfieri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diversity of species and genotypes of rotavirus field strains in a diarrhea outbreak in suckling piglets from an unvaccinated pig herd.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joice Elaine Teixeira CampanhaLaboratory of Animal Virology, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, PO Box 10011, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid - Campus Universitário, 86057-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Flávia PossattiLaboratory of Animal Virology, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, PO Box 10011, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid - Campus Universitário, 86057-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Elis LorenzettiLaboratory of Animal Virology, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, PO Box 10011, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid - Campus Universitário, 86057-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5032-712X
Daniel de Almeida MoraesLaboratory of Animal Virology, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, PO Box 10011, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid - Campus Universitário, 86057-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Alice Fernandes AlfieriLaboratory of Animal Virology, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, PO Box 10011, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid - Campus Universitário, 86057-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-956X
Amauri Alcindo AlfieriLaboratory of Animal Virology, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, PO Box 10011, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid - Campus Universitário, 86057-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. alfieri@uel.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7024-4487
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reports of rotavirus C (RVC) involvement in diarrhea outbreaks in newborn piglets have been increasing in recent years. This longitudinal study, conducted over a 37-day period, aimed to evaluate the frequency of RVC infection in piglets aged up to 7 days obtained from a pig herd with a previous diagnosis of RVC infection in this age group. Piglets from 50 different litters were monitored daily for the occurrence of diarrhea, and all litters were classified into the following categories: sow parity order (PO) 1 to 5; litter size (LS) ≤ 10 piglets and > 10 piglets; and piglet birth weight (BW) 1.2 to 1.3 kg and > 1.3 to 1.4 kg. Two hundred six diarrheic fecal samples were collected and classified according to the fecal consistency score (pasty, semiliquid, liquid). Ten fecal samples were collected from asymptomatic piglets (control group). Fecal samples were screened for rotavirus (RV) by silver stained-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (ss-PAGE), and samples with inconclusive and negative-ss-PAGE results were submitted to RVC VP6 gene amplification by RT-PCR. RVC was identified in 71 (34.5%) samples, in 1 (10%) sample of the control group, and in piglets from 33 (66%) litters. The electrophoretic profile of RV species A was identified in only two samples. Of the 72 RVC-positive samples, 51 (70.8%) presented semiliquid or liquid consistency. There was no significant difference in either group regarding the production parameters (PO, LS, BW) evaluated. An analysis of the whole VP6 gene of three RVC field strains collected on the first, fifteenth, and last day of the experiment enabled us to identify genotype I6. This report describes the first longitudinal study examining epidemiological aspects of RVC infection in newborn piglets.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornDiarrheaFecesFemaleGenotypeLongitudinal StudiesMalePhylogenyRotavirusSwineSwine DiseasesDiarrheaEpidemiologyNewbornPigRVC

Identifiers

PMID31997262
PMCPMC7455621
OpenAlexW3003240454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.