Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997108›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2020

Retrospective Analysis of a New York Newborn Screen Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Referral Center.

Melissa D Gans, Tatyana Gavrilova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa D GansDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Montefiore Medical Center, 1525 Blondell Ave, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. mstone@montefiore.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-0998
Tatyana GavrilovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Montefiore Medical Center, 1525 Blondell Ave, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Montefiore Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2010, the New York State (NYS) Newborn Screen (NBS) Program added the T cell receptor excision circle (TREC) assay to screen for severe combined immunodeficiency disorder (SCID). The objective of this study was to perform a retrospective chart review of 199 infants referred to a single institution for abnormal TREC on NYS NBS between 2010 and 2017. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance, logistic regression models, chi-square, and linear mixed models. One hundred ninety-nine infants were found to have a TREC value of fewer than 200 copies/μL on NYS NBS. Infants were stratified as primary immunodeficiency (PID) (n = 54), immunocompetent (n = 133), lost to follow-up (n = 8), or deceased (n = 4). PID included SCID (n = 3), DiGeorge (n = 6), idiopathic lymphopenia (IL) (n = 44), and other syndromes associated with lymphopenia (n = 3). The 3 SCID cases were identified and brought to treatment, although all experienced significant infections. The study population was found to be predominately non-Hispanic, African American, and male. There was a difference in the average TREC values among those with immunocompetence (83 copies/μL), IL (81 copies/μL), and PID (40 copies/μL) (p < 0.05). On follow-up of 40 patients with IL, patients typically did not have severe infections during first few years of life. This study demonstrates that TREC value can be used to stratify infants for further confirmatory testing to exclude PID. Risk factors, such as stressful prenatal/postnatal conditions, prematurity, race, and sex may affect TREC value but cannot explain all causes of lymphopenia. This study may assist providers in risk stratifying the likelihood of PID with an abnormal TREC and determining the extent of the initial work up that is necessary at the time of a newborn's presentation.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLymphopeniaMaleNeonatal ScreeningNew YorkReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSecondary Care CentersSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellidiopathic lymphopenianewborn screenNew York Stateprimary immunodeficiencySevere combined immunodeficiencyT cell receptor excision circle assay

Identifiers

PMID31997108
OpenAlexW3003516422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.