ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2020
Retrospective Analysis of a New York Newborn Screen Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Referral Center.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in the NHS newborn blood spot screening programme: a systematic review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- First 2-year experience of nationwide newborn screening for severe forms of T and B cell immunodeficiency: 2.3 million newborns analyzed using TREC and KREC in Russia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency: Genetics, Screening, and Preclinical Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Natural history of infants with non-SCID T cell lymphopenia identified on newborn screen.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2022Article
- Need for Uniform Definitions in Newborn Screening for SCID: The Next Challenge for Screeners and Immunologists.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021Article
- Characterization of Infants with Idiopathic Transient and Persistent T Cell Lymphopenia Identified by Newborn Screening-a Single-Center Experience in New York State.Journal of clinical immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2010, the New York State (NYS) Newborn Screen (NBS) Program added the T cell receptor excision circle (TREC) assay to screen for severe combined immunodeficiency disorder (SCID). The objective of this study was to perform a retrospective chart review of 199 infants referred to a single institution for abnormal TREC on NYS NBS between 2010 and 2017. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance, logistic regression models, chi-square, and linear mixed models. One hundred ninety-nine infants were found to have a TREC value of fewer than 200 copies/μL on NYS NBS. Infants were stratified as primary immunodeficiency (PID) (n = 54), immunocompetent (n = 133), lost to follow-up (n = 8), or deceased (n = 4). PID included SCID (n = 3), DiGeorge (n = 6), idiopathic lymphopenia (IL) (n = 44), and other syndromes associated with lymphopenia (n = 3). The 3 SCID cases were identified and brought to treatment, although all experienced significant infections. The study population was found to be predominately non-Hispanic, African American, and male. There was a difference in the average TREC values among those with immunocompetence (83 copies/μL), IL (81 copies/μL), and PID (40 copies/μL) (p < 0.05). On follow-up of 40 patients with IL, patients typically did not have severe infections during first few years of life. This study demonstrates that TREC value can be used to stratify infants for further confirmatory testing to exclude PID. Risk factors, such as stressful prenatal/postnatal conditions, prematurity, race, and sex may affect TREC value but cannot explain all causes of lymphopenia. This study may assist providers in risk stratifying the likelihood of PID with an abnormal TREC and determining the extent of the initial work up that is necessary at the time of a newborn's presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.