Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997082›Full record

ReviewVirus genes2020

Human polyomavirus modulation of the host DNA damage response.

Danyal Tahseen, Peter L Rady, Stephen K Tyring

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virus genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Role of the JC Virus in Central Nervous System Tumorigenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danyal TahseenDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical School At Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Peter L RadyDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical School At Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Stephen K TyringDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical School At Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. stephen.k.tyring@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-0580
Texas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human DNA damage response (DDR) is a complex signaling network constituting many factors responsible for the preservation of genomic integrity. Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) are able to harness the DDR machinery during their infectious cycle by expressing an array of tumor (T) antigens. These molecular interactions between human polyomavirus T antigens and the DDR create conditions that promote viral replication at the expense of host genomic stability to cause disease as well as carcinogenesis in the cases of the Merkel cell polyomavirus and BK polyomavirus. This review focuses on the six HPyVs with disease association, emphasizing strain-dependent differences in their selective manipulation of the DDR. Appreciation of the HPyV-DDR interface at a molecular scale is conducive to the development of novel therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Antigens, Polyomavirus TransformingBK VirusCarcinogenesisDNA DamageGenomic InstabilityHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMerkel cell polyomavirusNeoplasmsPolyomavirus InfectionsTumor Virus InfectionsAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingBKPyVDNA damage responseHCPyVHuman cancerHuman polyomavirusJCPyVLarge T antigenMCPyVOncogenesSmall T antigenTSPyVVirus–host cell interactions

Identifiers

PMID31997082
OpenAlexW3004283286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.