Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997047›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2020

Factors associated with decision-making on prophylactic hysterectomy and attitudes towards gynecological surveillance among women with Lynch syndrome (LS): a descriptive study.

Mari H Kalamo, J U Mäenpää, T T Seppälä, J P Mecklin, H Huhtala, K Sorvettula, K Pylvänäinen, S Staff

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mari H KalamoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. mari.h.kalamo@pshp.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-1022
J U MäenpääDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
T T SeppäläDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J P MecklinDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
H HuhtalaFaculty of Medicine and Medical Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
K SorvettulaFaculty of Medicine and Medical Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
K PylvänäinenDepartment of Education and Science, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.
S StaffDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To prevent endometrial carcinoma in Lynch syndrome (LS), regular gynecological surveillance visits and prophylactic surgery are recommended. Previous data have shown that prophylactic hysterectomy is an effective means of cancer prevention, while the advantages and disadvantages of surveillance are somewhat unclear. We aimed to evaluate female LS carriers' attitudes towards regular gynecological surveillance and factors influencing their decision-making on prophylactic surgery that have not been well documented. Pain experienced during endometrial biopsies was also evaluated. Postal questionnaires were sent to LS carriers undergoing regular gynecological surveillance. Questionnaires were sent to 112 women with LS, of whom 76 responded (68%). Forty-two (55%) had undergone prophylactic hysterectomy by the time of the study. The majority of responders (64/76; 84.2%) considered surveillance appointments beneficial. Pain level during endometrial biopsy was not associated with the decision to undergo prophylactic surgery. The level of satisfaction the women had with the information and advice provided during surveillance was significantly associated with the history of prophylactic hysterectomy (satisfaction rate of 73.2% versus 31.8% of nonoperated women, p = 0.003). The women who had undergone prophylactic surgery were older than the nonoperated women both at mutation testing (median of 42.3 years versus 31.6 years, p < 0.001) and at the time of the study (median of 56.9 years versus 46.0 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Women with LS pathogenic variants have positive experiences with gynecological surveillance visits, and their perception of the quality of the information and advice obtained plays an important role in their decision-making concerning prophylactic surgery.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA-Binding ProteinsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFinlandGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsG-T mismatch-binding proteinMLH1 protein, humanMSH2 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinHNPCCLynch syndromeProphylactic surgerySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31997047
PMCPMC7101284
OpenAlexW3004048021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.