Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997024›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2020

Impact of yeast and lactic acid bacteria on mastitis and milk microbiota composition of dairy cows.

Jing Gao, Yu-Chen Liu, Yu Wang, Han Li, Xiang-Ming Wang, Yan Wu, Ding-Ran Zhang, Si Gao, Zhi-Li Qi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Long-TermAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Anti-Inflammatory Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The preventive effect of probioticFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Effects of BovineMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing GaoDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yu-Chen LiuDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Han LiDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Xiang-Ming WangDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yan WuDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Ding-Ran ZhangDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Si GaoDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Zhi-Li QiDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. zhiliqi@mail.hzau.edu.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-3155
Huazhong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2662018PY079National Key Research and Development Program 2016YFD0500507National Key Research and Development Program 2018YFD0501605State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Open Program 2004DA125184F1721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of yeast and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on mastitis and milk microbiota composition of dairy cows. Thirty lactating Holstein cows with similar parity, days in milk were randomly assigned to five treatments, including: (1) Health cows with milk SCC < 500,000 cells/mL, no clinical signs of mastitis were found, fed basal total mixed ration (TMR) without supplementation (H); (2) Mastitis cows with milk SCC > 500,000 cells/mL, fed basal TMR without supplementation (M); (3) Mastitis cows fed basal TMR supplemented with 8 g day

Indexed as

Dairy cowsLactic acid bacteriaMastitisMilk microbiota compositionYeast

Identifiers

PMID31997024
PMCPMC6987887
OpenAlexW3003434721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.