ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
SurgAI: deep learning for computerized laparoscopic image understanding in gynaecology.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the operating room: A systematic review of AI models for surgical phase, instruments and anatomical structure identification.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Computer-aided anatomy recognition in intrathoracic and -abdominal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- The Advances in Computer Vision That Are Enabling More Autonomous Actions in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Deep learning visual analysis in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01).Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Artificial intelligence-based anatomical segmentation in transabdominal preperitoneal repair of groin hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Deep learning for intraoperative recognition of critical structures in total hysterectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based model for identifying anatomical and surgical structures in the videos of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Tools in Precision Lung Cancer Care: From Early Detection to Clinical Decision Support.Cancers · 2026Review
- Optimal quantitative metrics reflecting surgeons' qualitative evaluation in deep learning-based intraoperative anatomy recognition task: a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- IMAU-Net: A Hybrid Multi-Scale Deep Learning Framework for Liver Segmentation from Laparoscopic Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automatic and Real-Time Surgeon's Gazing Point Detection From Surgical Videos Using Machine Learning and Mathematical Algorithm.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Article
- Assessment of AI-driven anatomical recognition in robotic gastrectomy: A multicenter retrospective analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: Perspectives and challenges.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Review
- Applications of Deep Learning Models in Laparoscopy for Gynecology.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based intraoperative visual guidance model for ureter identification in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A pioneering artificial intelligence tool to predict treatment outcomes in ovarian cancer via diagnostic laparoscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated assessment of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill performance using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- From Data to Decision: A Comprehensive Review of Real-Time Analytics and Smart Technologies in the Surgical Suite.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn laparoscopy, the digital camera offers surgeons the opportunity to receive support from image-guided surgery systems. Such systems require image understanding, the ability for a computer to understand what the laparoscope sees. Image understanding has recently progressed owing to the emergence of artificial intelligence and especially deep learning techniques. However, the state of the art of deep learning in gynaecology only offers image-based detection, reporting the presence or absence of an anatomical structure, without finding its location. A solution to the localisation problem is given by the concept of semantic segmentation, giving the detection and pixel-level location of a structure in an image. The state-of-the-art results in semantic segmentation are achieved by deep learning, whose usage requires a massive amount of annotated data. We propose the first dataset dedicated to this task and the first evaluation of deep learning-based semantic segmentation in gynaecology.
methodsWe used the deep learning method called Mask R-CNN. Our dataset has 461 laparoscopic images manually annotated with three classes: uterus, ovaries and surgical tools. We split our dataset in 361 images to train Mask R-CNN and 100 images to evaluate its performance.
resultsThe segmentation accuracy is reported in terms of percentage of overlap between the segmented regions from Mask R-CNN and the manually annotated ones. The accuracy is 84.5%, 29.6% and 54.5% for uterus, ovaries and surgical tools, respectively. An automatic detection of these structures was then inferred from the semantic segmentation results which led to state-of-the-art detection performance, except for the ovaries. Specifically, the detection accuracy is 97%, 24% and 86% for uterus, ovaries and surgical tools, respectively.
conclusionOur preliminary results are very promising, given the relatively small size of our initial dataset. The creation of an international surgical database seems essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31996995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.