ArticleSkeletal radiology2020
Interchangeability of CT and 3D "pseudo-CT" MRI for preoperative planning in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individualized 3D Planning for Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: Study Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An MRI-Based Method for the Morphologic Assessment of the Anterior Tibial Tuberosity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Imaging of Osteosarcoma: Presenting Findings, Metastatic Patterns, and Features Related to Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Deep learning-based pseudo-CT synthesis from zero echo time MR sequences of the pelvis.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Emerging Innovations in Preoperative Planning and Motion Analysis in Orthopedic Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- AI musculoskeletal clinical applications: how can AI increase my day-to-day efficiency?Skeletal radiology · 2022Review
- A three-dimensional measurement method on MR arthrography of the hip to classify femoro-acetabular impingement.Japanese journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether a 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence with postprocessing applied to simulate computed tomography (CT) ("pseudo-CT") images can be used instead of CT to measure acetabular version and alpha angles and to plan for surgery in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIALS AND
methodsFour readers retrospectively measured acetabular version and alpha angles on MRI and CT images of 40 hips from 20 consecutive patients (9 female patients, 11 male patients; mean age, 26.0 ± 6.5 years) with FAI. 3D models created from MRI and CT images were assessed by 2 orthopedic surgeons to determine the need for femoroplasty and/or acetabuloplasty. Interchangeability of MRI with CT was tested by comparing agreement between 2 readers using CT (intramodality) with agreement between 1 reader using CT and 1 using MRI (intermodality).
resultsIntramodality and intermodality agreement values were nearly identical for acetabular version and alpha angle measurements and for surgical planning. Increases in inter-reader disagreement for acetabular version angle, alpha angle, and surgical planning when MRI was substituted for CT were - 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], - 7.7 to + 3.5%; p = 0.459), - 0.6% (95% CI, - 8.6 to + 7.3%; p = 0.878), and 0% (95% CI, - 15.1 to + 15.1%; p = 1.0), respectively, when an agreement criterion ≤ 5° was used for angle measurements.
conclusionPseudo-CT MRI was interchangeable with CT for measuring acetabular version and highly favorable for interchangeability for measuring alpha angle and for surgical planning, suggesting that MRI could replace CT in assessing patients with FAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31996983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.