Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996981›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2020

The effect of meniscal repair on strength deficits 6 months after ACL reconstruction.

M Wenning, A H Heitner, M Mauch, D Gehring, C Ramsenthaler, J Paul

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. General, spinal or regional anaesthesia does not affect strength performance 6 months after ACL reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

M WenningPraxisklinik Rennbahn AG, Kriegackerstraße 100, 4132, Muttenz, Basel, Switzerland. research@rennbahnklinik.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-2317
A H HeitnerPraxisklinik Rennbahn AG, Kriegackerstraße 100, 4132, Muttenz, Basel, Switzerland.
M MauchPraxisklinik Rennbahn AG, Kriegackerstraße 100, 4132, Muttenz, Basel, Switzerland.
D GehringDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Schwarzwaldstr. 175, Freiburg, 79117, Germany.
C RamsenthalerDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Schwarzwaldstr. 175, Freiburg, 79117, Germany.
J PaulPraxisklinik Rennbahn AG, Kriegackerstraße 100, 4132, Muttenz, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRuptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be accompanied by meniscal lesions. Generally, the rehabilitation protocols are altered by meniscal repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of meniscal repair on the early recovery of thigh muscle strength in ACL reconstruction (ACLR). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a matched cohort analysis of n = 122 isolated ACLR (CON) compared to n = 61 ACLR with meniscal repair (ACLR + MR). The subgroups of meniscal repair consisted of 30 patients who had undergone medial meniscus repairs (MM), 19 lateral meniscus repairs (LM) and 12 repairs of medial and lateral meniscus (BM). Isokinetic strength measurement was performed pre-operatively and 6 months post-surgery to perform a cross-sectional and a longitudinal analysis. All injuries were unilateral, and the outcome measures were compared to the non-affected contralateral leg.

resultsSix months postoperatively overall there is no significant difference between the groups (extension strength MR 82% vs. CON 85% and flexion strength 86% vs. 88%, resp.). Subgroup analysis showed that medial repairs exhibit a comparable leg symmetry while lateral repairs performed worse with leg symmetry being 76% in extension and 81% in flexion strength. Patients undergoing BM repair performed in between lateral and medial repairs (82% extension, 86% flexion).

conclusionGenerally, meniscal repair in conjunction with ACLR does not significantly alter the recovery of limb symmetry in strength at 6 months postoperatively. Interestingly, medial repairs seem to perform superior to lateral meniscal repair and repair of both menisci. Since the recovery of symmetric strength is a major factor in rehabilitation testing, these results will help to advise surgeons on appropriate rehabilitation protocols and setting realistic goals for the injured athlete. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesHumansLower ExtremityMenisci, TibialMuscle StrengthRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeACL reconstructionIsokinetic strengthMeniscal repairPerformance testingReturn to sports

Identifiers

PMID31996981
PMCPMC7244600
OpenAlexW3004019786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.