ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Native joint infections].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Acute diagnostics-focus on septic arthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Review
- Septic Arthritis of the Elbow: A 10-Year Retrospective Clinical and Microbiological Review From a Single Center.Cureus · 2025Article
- Destructive Cryptococcal Osteomyelitis Mimicking Tuberculous Spondylitis.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Incidence of Secondary Osteoarthritis after Primary Shoulder and Knee Empyema and Its Risk Factors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Identification of discriminatory factors and construction of nomograms for differentiating AOSD and sepsis.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Establishment of a differential diagnosis method and an online prediction platform for AOSD and sepsis based on gradient boosting decision trees algorithm.Arthritis research & therapy · 2023Article
- The role of synovial fluid aspiration in shoulder joint infections.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Joint infections are a great challenge for the treating physicians. Infection of a native joint can result in the rapid destruction of the joint if treatment is inadequate or delayed and is associated with severe life-threatening diseases, such as sepsis. This article presents a detailed overview of the treatment of joint infections of native joints with a focus on the diagnostic approach and treatment decisions. Infections in native joints are caused either endogenously by hematogenic spreading or are caused by exogenous factors. A relevant proportion of joint infections in native joints occur in connection with iatrogenic measures, such as operations, synovial punctures and joint infiltrations. Fundamentally, acute infections represent an orthopedic surgical emergency, which is associated with the necessity for immediate operative measures. The best possible success can only be achieved by an interaction between early diagnosis, an adequate surgical approach and a tailor-made anti-infectious treatment. This is also the case with periprosthetic infections, which will be dealt with in detail in a second article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.