Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996814›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2020

Perspectives of patients and physicians regarding hypertensive management from an online survey for excellence: a subanalysis of the PARADOX study by physician categories.

Takuo Yoshida, Nobuhiro Nishigaki, Shun Saita, Yukio Shimasaki, Naoyuki Hasebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Blood pressure status, JSH 2019-based control rate, and associated factors among community-dwelling adults: The NOSE study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Home blood pressure-based treatment with hypertension specialists: a better strategy for overcoming uncontrolled blood pressure.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Medical Telemonitoring for the Management of Hypertension in Older Patients in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  8. Latest hypertension research to inform clinical practice in Asia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Mass clinical survey as a possible population strategy for the better control of hypertension in Japan.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takuo YoshidaJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan. takuo.yoshida@takeda.com.
Nobuhiro NishigakiJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun SaitaJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukio ShimasakiJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoyuki HasebeDivision of Cardiology, Nephrology, Respiratory and Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An existing clinical problem in Japan is the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension despite the availability of various effective therapies. Here, we analyzed survey data to gain insight into this paradox from physicians' perspectives, with results categorized according to specialty (i.e., with or without certification by the Japanese Society of Hypertension [JSH]), institution type, gender, and age. A web-based survey of typical educational activities for patients regarding hypertension management was conducted in Japan between October 19 and 31, 2017. Differences between physician groups were investigated per category. Survey results from 541 physicians were analyzed: 59 JSH certified (i.e., 'specialist') vs 482 non-JSH certified (i.e., 'nonspecialist') physicians; 192 general practitioners vs 349 hospital physicians; 500 males vs 41 females; and 178 younger (mean age: 40.7 years), 174 middle-aged (52.0 years) or 189 older (61.3 years) physicians. The most statistically significant differences between groups were observed in the category of physician specialty. Compared with nonspecialists, specialist physicians were more conscious of providing education on patient lifestyle modifications, more aware of patient- and physician-derived issues, and understood and followed the treatment guidelines. General practitioners cared more about the patient's burden than did hospital physicians. Younger physicians identified the need to incorporate the patient's perspective into their treatment. This analysis shows that the provision and perceptions of education differ between physician categories. Compared with specialist physicians, nonspecialists were less likely to provide adequate guidance on lifestyle modifications, possibly due to their uncertainty in understanding treatment guideline recommendations. Further education of nonspecialists on hypertension management may be warranted.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelDisease ManagementFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansHypertensionJapanMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesDisease managementHypertensionPhysiciansSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31996814
PMCPMC8075984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.