ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2020
Perspectives of patients and physicians regarding hypertensive management from an online survey for excellence: a subanalysis of the PARADOX study by physician categories.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood pressure status, JSH 2019-based control rate, and associated factors among community-dwelling adults: The NOSE study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Association between care by hypertension specialists and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Home blood pressure-based treatment with hypertension specialists: a better strategy for overcoming uncontrolled blood pressure.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Strategies for improving the treatment and control of hypertension in Japan.Journal of human hypertension · 2024Review
- Achievement rate of target blood pressure in patients with hypertension treated by hypertension specialists and non-specialists in a real-world setting.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023Article
- Medical Telemonitoring for the Management of Hypertension in Older Patients in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Latest hypertension research to inform clinical practice in Asia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022Article
- Seven-action approaches for the management of hypertension in Asia - The HOPE Asia network.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Review
- Mass clinical survey as a possible population strategy for the better control of hypertension in Japan.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
- Physician and patient perspectives on hypertension management and factors associated with lifestyle modifications in Japan: results from an online survey.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An existing clinical problem in Japan is the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension despite the availability of various effective therapies. Here, we analyzed survey data to gain insight into this paradox from physicians' perspectives, with results categorized according to specialty (i.e., with or without certification by the Japanese Society of Hypertension [JSH]), institution type, gender, and age. A web-based survey of typical educational activities for patients regarding hypertension management was conducted in Japan between October 19 and 31, 2017. Differences between physician groups were investigated per category. Survey results from 541 physicians were analyzed: 59 JSH certified (i.e., 'specialist') vs 482 non-JSH certified (i.e., 'nonspecialist') physicians; 192 general practitioners vs 349 hospital physicians; 500 males vs 41 females; and 178 younger (mean age: 40.7 years), 174 middle-aged (52.0 years) or 189 older (61.3 years) physicians. The most statistically significant differences between groups were observed in the category of physician specialty. Compared with nonspecialists, specialist physicians were more conscious of providing education on patient lifestyle modifications, more aware of patient- and physician-derived issues, and understood and followed the treatment guidelines. General practitioners cared more about the patient's burden than did hospital physicians. Younger physicians identified the need to incorporate the patient's perspective into their treatment. This analysis shows that the provision and perceptions of education differ between physician categories. Compared with specialist physicians, nonspecialists were less likely to provide adequate guidance on lifestyle modifications, possibly due to their uncertainty in understanding treatment guideline recommendations. Further education of nonspecialists on hypertension management may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.