Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996709›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Home-based cognitive training in pediatric patients with acquired brain injury: preliminary results on efficacy of a randomized clinical trial.

Claudia Corti, Cosimo Urgesi, Geraldina Poggi, Sandra Strazzer, Renato Borgatti, Alessandra Bardoni

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia Corti *Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy. claudia.corti@lanostrafamiglia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-3182
Cosimo Urgesi *Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-1328
Geraldina PoggiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Sandra StrazzerScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-6565
Renato BorgattiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Alessandra BardoniScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) Ricerca Corrente 2015-2017 to A.B.Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) Ricerca Corrente 2018-2019Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) Ricerca Corrente 2018-2019 to R.B.Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) Ricerca Finalizzata-grant-net-2013-02356160Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) Ricerca Finalizzata grant NET-2013-02356160 to R.B.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive rehabilitation may compensate for cognitive deficits of children with acquired brain injury (ABI), capitalizing on the use-dependent plasticity of a developing brain. Remote computerized cognitive training (CCT) may be delivered to patients in ecological settings, ensuring rehabilitation continuity. This work evaluated cognitive and psychological adjustment outcomes of an 8-week multi-domain, home-based CCT (Lumosity Cognitive Training) in a sample of patients with ABI aged 11-16 years. Two groups of patients were engaged in five CCT sessions per week for eight weeks (40 sessions). According to a stepped-wedge research design, one group (Training-first Group) started the CCT immediately, whereas the other group (Waiting-first Group) started the CCT after a comparable time of waiting list. Changes after the training and after the waiting period were compared in the two groups. Both groups improved in visual-spatial working memory more after the training than after the waiting-list period. The Training-first group improved also in arithmetic calculation speed. Findings indicate that a multi-domain CCT can produce benefits in visual-spatial working memory, probably because, in accordance with previous research, computer games heavily tax visuo-spatial abilities. This suggests that the prolonged stimulation of the same cognitive ability may generate the greatest benefits in children with ABI.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrain InjuriesChildCognitive Behavioral TherapyCognitive DysfunctionEmotional AdjustmentFollow-Up StudiesGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansIntelligence TestsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31996709
PMCPMC6989528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.