Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996395›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Response and outcomes after anti-CTLA4 versus anti-PD1 combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective analysis of two single-institution prospective trials.

Dawei Chen, Hari Menon, Vivek Verma, Chunxiao Guo, Rishab Ramapriyan, Hampartsoum Barsoumian, Ahmed Younes, Yun Hu, Mark Wasley, Maria Angelica Cortez and 1 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02239900 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I/II Trial of Ipilimumab (Immunotherapy) and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2014 to 2019Enrolled143ConditionsLiver Cancer, Lung CancerArmsIpilimumab, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
NCT02444741 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Phase I/II Trial of MK-3475 and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Patients With NSCLC

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2015 to 2026Enrolled124ConditionsMalignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7Arms3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Pembrolizumab, Proton Beam Radiation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The association between additional radiotherapy after systemic chemotherapy and the prognosis of stage FIGO 2018 IVB cervical cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dawei Chen *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Hari Menon *Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Vivek VermaDepartment of radiation oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States.
Chunxiao GuoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, China.
Rishab RamapriyanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Hampartsoum BarsoumianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Ahmed YounesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Yun HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Mark WasleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Maria Angelica CortezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
James WelshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States JWelsh@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAllegheny General Hospital · USShandong First Medical University · CN

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study compared response rates and outcomes of combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy (iRT) based on the type of checkpoint inhibitor (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) vs antiprogrammed death-1 (PD1)) for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed two prospective trials of radiation combined with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 for patients with mNSCLC. Patients undergoing non-salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to lung sites were selected from both trials and grouped by the immunotherapeutic compound received. Endpoints included in-field and out-of-field response rates, and overall response rate (complete or partial response) (all by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsMedian follow-up times for the 33 patients (n=17 SBRT+anti-CTLA4, n=16 SBRT+anti-PD1) were 19.6 and 19.9 months. Response rates for out-of-field lesions were similar between anti-PD1 (37%) and anti-CTLA4 (24%) (p=0.054). However, global response rates for all lesions were 24% anti-CTLA4 vs 56% anti-PD1 (p=0.194). The PFS was 76% for anti-CTLA4 vs 94% anti-PD1 at 3 months, 52% vs 87% at 6 months, 31% vs 80% at 12 months, and 23% vs 63% at 18 months (p=0.02). Respective OS values were 76% vs 87% at 6 months, 47% vs 80% at 12 months, and 39% vs 66% at 18 months (p=0.08).

conclusionsBoth anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 agents prompt a similar degree of in-field and out-of-field responses after iRT, although the global response rate and PFS were statistically higher in the anti-PD1 cohort. Further dedicated study and biological mechanistic assessment is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02239900 and NCT02444741.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials as TopicCTLA-4 AntigenFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorimmunotherapyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31996395
PMCPMC7057428
OpenAlexW3004373164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.