Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996363›Full record

Trial reportBMJ supportive & palliative care2022

NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin.

Winnie Yeo, Thomas Kh Lau, Carol Ch Kwok, Kwai T Lai, Vicky Tc Chan, Leung Li, Vivian Chan, Ashley Wong, Winnie Mt Soo, Eva Wm Yeung and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03386617 (Open Label Single Arm Study for NEPA [Oral Fixed-dose Combination of 300 mg Netupitant and 0.50 mg Palonosetron] in Hong Kong Oncology Patients Receiving), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03386617 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Open Label Single Arm Study for NEPA [Oral Fixed-dose Combination of 300 mg Netupitant and 0.50 mg Palonosetron] in Hong Kong Oncology Patients Receiving (Neo)-Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment Consists of Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide for Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2018 to 2028Enrolled55ConditionsBreast CancerArmsNEPA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Winnie YeoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong winnieyeo@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0863-8469
Thomas Kh LauDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Carol Ch KwokDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Kwai T LaiDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Vicky Tc ChanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Leung LiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Vivian ChanDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Ashley WongDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Winnie Mt SooDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Eva Wm YeungDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Kam H WongDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Nelson Ls TangDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Joyce Js SuenDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Frankie Kf MoDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is a prospective study evaluating NEPA in patients with breast cancer (the NEPA group), who received (neo)adjuvant AC chemotherapy (consisting of doxorubicin 60 mg/m PATIENTS AND

methods60 patients participated in the NEPA group; 62 were in the APR group. Eligibility criteria of both groups were similar, that is, Chinese patients with breast cancer who were treated with (neo)adjuvant AC. NEPA group received NEPA and dexamethasone; APR group received aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone. Individuals filled in self-reported diary, visual analogue scale for nausea and Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire.

resultsWithin the NEPA group, 70.0%, 85.7% and 60.0%, respectively reported complete response in the acute, delayed and overall phases in cycle 1 AC. When compared with the historical APR group during cycle 1 AC, NEPA group achieved significantly higher rates of complete response, complete protection, total control, 'no significant nausea' and 'no nausea' in the delayed phase; similar findings were noted in the overall phase with significantly better quality of life. Superior efficacy of NEPA was maintained over multiple cycles. Both antiemetic regimens were well tolerated.

conclusionIn this study on Chinese patients with breast cancer who were uniformly receiving AC, NEPA was effective in controlling CINV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03386617.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAprepitantCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDoxorubicinFemaleHumansNauseaProspective StudiesPyridinesQuality of LifeVomitingAprepitantCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDoxorubicinPyridinesnausea and vomitingnetupitant, palonosetron, Akynzeo, Emend, Asiansquality of life

Identifiers

PMID31996363
PMCPMC9304103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.