Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996259›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Challenges in the design, planning and implementation of trials evaluating group interventions.

Katie Biggs, Daniel Hind, Rebecca Gossage-Worrall, Kirsty Sprange, David White, Jessica Wright, Robin Chatters, Katherine Berry, Diana Papaioannou, Mike Bradburn and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05663970 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Parent-mediated Intervention for Toddlers With Early Social Communication Challenges or Emerging Autism: A Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial of a Group-based Virtual Program That Empowers Parents as Change Agents

TypeinterventionalSponsorHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsAutism Spectrum Disorder, Social Communication Disorder, Autism or Autistic Traits, Autism Spectrum Disorder With Impaired Functional LanguageArmsVG Social ABCs
NCT06878937 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

'Thriving With Bipolar Disorder': Co-design and Pilot Evaluation of a Peer-Delivered, Quality of Life Focused Group Psychoeducation Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsBipolar Disorder (BD), Quality of Life (QOL)ArmsPeer Delivered Psychoeducation Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management Program: A Pilot.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katie BiggsSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. c.e.biggs@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4468-7417
Daniel HindSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Rebecca Gossage-WorrallSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Kirsty SprangeNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David WhiteSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Jessica WrightSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Robin ChattersSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Katherine BerrySchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Diana PapaioannouSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Mike BradburnSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Stephen J WaltersSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Cindy CooperSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 08/107/01Department of Health 12/28/05Department of Health NIHR-CTF-2013-02-003Health Technology Assessment Programme 08/107/01Health Technology Assessment Programme 12/28/05Health Technology Assessment Programme 14/140/80Medical Research Council G1001406Public Health Research Programme 09-3004-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGroup interventions are interventions delivered to groups of people rather than to individuals and are used in healthcare for mental health recovery, behaviour change, peer support, self-management and/or health education. Evaluating group interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) presents trialists with a set of practical problems, which are not present in RCTs of one-to-one interventions and which may not be immediately obvious.

methodsCase-based approach summarising Sheffield trials unit's experience in the design and implementation of five group interventions. We reviewed participant recruitment and attrition, facilitator training and attrition, attendance at the group sessions, group size and fidelity aspects across five RCTs.

resultsMedian recruitment across the five trials was 3.2 (range 1.7-21.0) participants per site per month. Group intervention trials involve a delay in starting the intervention for some participants, until sufficient numbers are available to start a group. There was no evidence that the timing of consent, relative to randomisation, affected post-randomisation attrition which was a matter of concern for all trial teams. Group facilitator attrition was common in studies where facilitators were employed by the health system rather than the by the grant holder and led to the early closure of one trial; research sites responded by training 'back-up' and new facilitators. Trials specified that participants had to attend a median of 62.5% (range 16.7%-80%) of sessions, in order to receive a 'therapeutic dose'; a median of 76.7% (range 42.9%-97.8%) received a therapeutic dose. Across the five trials, 75.3% of all sessions went ahead without the pre-specified ideal group size. A variety of methods were used to assess the fidelity of group interventions at a group and individual level across the five trials.

conclusionThis is the first paper to provide an empirical basis for planning group intervention trials. Investigators should expect delays/difficulties in recruiting groups of the optimal size, plan for both facilitator and participant attrition, and consider how group attendance and group size affects treatment fidelity.

trial registrationISRCTN17993825 registered on 11/10/2016, ISRCTN28645428 registered on 11/04/2012, ISRCTN61215213 registered on 11/05/2011, ISRCTN67209155 registered on 22/03/2012, ISRCTN19447796 registered on 20/03/2014.

Indexed as

Health PromotionPatient Education as TopicPatient SelectionPersonnel TurnoverRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansPatient DropoutsResearch DesignResearch PersonnelTime FactorsClinical trialsGroup interventionsImplementationIntervention designTherapy groupsTreatment fidelity

Identifiers

PMID31996259
PMCPMC6990578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.