Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996220›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2020

Inhalation of printer-emitted particles impairs cardiac conduction, hemodynamics, and autonomic regulation and induces arrhythmia and electrical remodeling in rats.

Alex P Carll, Renata Salatini, Sandra V Pirela, Yun Wang, Zhengzhi Xie, Pawel Lorkiewicz, Nazratan Naeem, Yong Qian, Vincent Castranova, John J Godleski and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex P CarllDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Renata SalatiniDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Sandra V PirelaCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology. Department of Environmental Health, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Room 1310, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Yun WangCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology. Department of Environmental Health, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Room 1310, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Zhengzhi XieChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Pawel LorkiewiczChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Nazratan NaeemChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Yong QianPathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Vincent CastranovaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences/Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
John J GodleskiCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology. Department of Environmental Health, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Room 1310, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Philip DemokritouCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology. Department of Environmental Health, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Room 1310, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. pdemokri@hsph.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Louisville · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Training Program in Molecular and Integrative Physiological SciencesT32HL007118 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI LU, QUAN · 1985 to 2025
$14.3M
TBDP30GM127607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BHATNAGAR, ARUNI · 2018 to 2022
$6.3M
The Role of E-cigarette Characteristics and Constituents in Cardiac Dysfunction--Diversity SupplementR01HL147343 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI CARLL, ALEX PERROW · 2019 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL147343NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL147343NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007118NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM127607NIOSH CDC HHS 212-2012-M-51174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing engineered nanomaterial-based toners, laser printers generate aerosols with alarming levels of nanoparticles that bear high bioactivity and potential health risks. Yet, the cardiac impacts of printer-emitted particles (PEPs) are unknown. Inhalation of particulate matter (PM) promotes cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and ultra-fine particulates (< 0.1 μm aerodynamic diameter) may bear toxicity unique from larger particles. Toxicological studies suggest that PM impairs left ventricular (LV) performance; however, such investigations have heretofore required animal restraint, anesthesia, or ex vivo preparations that can confound physiologic endpoints and/or prohibit LV mechanical assessments during exposure. To assess the acute and chronic effects of PEPs on cardiac physiology, male Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to PEPs (21 days, 5 h/day) while monitoring LV pressure (LVP) and electrocardiogram (ECG) via conscious telemetry, analyzing LVP and heart rate variability (HRV) in four-day increments from exposure days 1 to 21, as well as ECG and baroreflex sensitivity. At 2, 35, and 70 days after PEPs exposure ceased, rats received stress tests.

resultsOn day 21 of exposure, PEPs significantly (P < 0.05 vs. Air) increased LV end systolic pressure (LVESP, + 18 mmHg) and rate-pressure-product (+ 19%), and decreased HRV indicating sympathetic dominance (root means squared of successive differences [RMSSD], - 21%). Overall, PEPs decreased LV ejection time (- 9%), relaxation time (- 3%), tau (- 5%), RMSSD (- 21%), and P-wave duration (- 9%). PEPs increased QTc interval (+ 5%) and low:high frequency HRV (+ 24%; all P < 0.05 vs. Air), while tending to decrease baroreflex sensitivity and contractility index (- 15% and - 3%, P < 0.10 vs. Air). Relative to Air, at both 2 and 35 days after PEPs, ventricular arrhythmias increased, and at 70 days post-exposure LVESP increased. PEPs impaired ventricular repolarization at 2 and 35 days post-exposure, but only during stress tests. At 72 days post-exposure, PEPs increased urinary dopamine 5-fold and protein expression of ventricular repolarizing channels, K

conclusionsOur findings suggest exposure to PEPs increases cardiovascular risk by augmenting sympathetic influence, impairing ventricular performance and repolarization, and inducing hypertension and arrhythmia. PEPs may present significant health risks through adverse cardiovascular effects, especially in occupational settings, among susceptible individuals, and with long-term exposure.

Indexed as

AerosolsAir PollutantsAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHemodynamicsInhalation ExposureMaleParticulate MatterPrintingRats, Sprague-DawleySympathetic Nervous SystemVentricular PressureAerosolsAir PollutantsParticulate MatterArrhythmiaAutonomicCardiacContractilityElectrical remodelingElectrocardiogramLeft ventricular pressureNanoparticlesParticulate matterPrintersRepolarizationTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID31996220
PMCPMC6990551
OpenAlexW3005953502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.