ArticleBMC public health2020
Social franchising of community-based HIV counselling and testing services to increase HIV testing and linkage to care in Tshwane, South Africa: study protocol for a non-randomised implementation trial.
Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uptake of HIV testing and its correlates among sexually experienced college students in Southwestern, China: a Web-Based online cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- The practice of pilot/feasibility studies in informing the conduct of HIV related clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeeting the ambitious UN 90-90-90 HIV testing, treatment and viral load suppression targets requires innovative strategies and approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa. To date no known interventions have been tested with community health workers (counsellors) as social franchisees or owner-managed businesses in Community-based HIV counselling and testing (CBCT) work. The aim of this methods paper is to describe a Social franchise (SF) CBCT implementation trial to increase HIV testing and linkage to care for individuals at community levels in comparison with an existing CBCT programme methods. METHODS/
designThis is a two arm non-randomised community implementation trial with a once off round of post-test follow-up per HIV positive participant to assess linkage to care in low income communities. The intervention arm is a social franchise CBCT in which unemployed, self-employed or employed community members are recruited, contracted and incentivised to test at least 100 people per month, identifying at least 5 HIV positive tests and linking to care at least 4 of them. Social franchisees receive approximately $3.20 per HIV test and $8 per client linked to care. In the control arm, full-time employed HIV counsellors conduct CBCT on a fixed monthly salary. Primary study outcomes are HIV testing uptake rate, HIV positivity, Linkage to care and treatment rate and average counsellors' remuneration cost. Data collection will be conducted using both paper-based and electronic data applications by CBCT or SF counsellors. Data analysis will compare proportions of HIV testing, positivity, linkage to HIV care and treatment rates and counsellors' cost in the two study arms. DISCUSSION: The study will provide important insight into whether the SF-delivered CBCT programme increases testing coverage and linkage to care as well as reducing CBCT cost per HIV test and per HIV positive person linked to care.
trial registrationPan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR201809873079121. The trial was retrospectively registered on 11 September 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.