Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996175›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Helping people with psychosis to expand their social networks: the stakeholders' views.

Helena Tee, Stefan Priebe, Carlos Santos, Penny Xanthopoulou, Martin Webber, Domenico Giacco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helena TeeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, Glen Road, London, E13 8SP, UK. helena.tee@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6444-5787
Stefan PriebeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, Glen Road, London, E13 8SP, UK.
Carlos SantosEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Glen Road, London, E13 8SP, UK.
Penny XanthopoulouCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter. St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX2 4TH, UK.
Martin WebberDepartment of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Domenico GiaccoUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, Glen Road, London, E13 8SP, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0615-20009Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-0615-20009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with psychosis experience more social isolation than any other diagnostic group and have smaller social networks than the general population. This isolation can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. No direct, standardised interventions have been developed to specifically target this issue. Stakeholders input appears crucial in the process of developing such an intervention. This study aimed to identify the main considerations when developing an intervention aiming to reduce social isolation in people with psychosis.

methodsFocus groups and individual interviews were conducted with patients, carers and mental health staff. Data was thematically analysed.

resultsThirty four patients with psychosis, 26 carers of people experiencing psychosis and 22 mental health professionals participated in the study. Suggested aspects to be considered in a novel intervention were: i) finding and training the right staff member; ii) discussing negative social attitudes and patients' previous negative experiences, iii) addressing personal ambivalence; iv) establishing how best to provide information about social activities; v) facilitating access to social activities, vi) striking a balance between support and independence.

conclusionThe suggestions identified can help to develop more targeted approaches to reduce social isolation within this patient group. A patient-centred approach and generic communication skills appear to be underpinning most of the helpful elements identified, whilst specific techniques and skills can help to overcome negative past experiences and motivational barriers.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersQuality of LifeSocial IsolationStakeholder ParticipationPsychosisPsychotic disordersSocial contactsSocial isolationSocial network

Identifiers

PMID31996175
PMCPMC6990576
OpenAlexW3005679613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.