Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996167›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2020

Enabling good outcomes in older adults on dialysis: a qualitative study.

Rajesh Raj, Bridget Brown, Kiran Ahuja, Mai Frandsen, Matthew Jose

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patients' Perspectives on Health-Related Social Needs and Recommendations for Interventions: A Qualitative Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajesh RajSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. rajesh.raj@ths.tas.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4781-3255
Bridget BrownLaunceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia.
Kiran AhujaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Mai FrandsenFaculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Matthew JoseSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AULaunceston General Hospital · AU

Funding

Clifford Craig Foundation 131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder patients on dialysis may not have optimal outcomes, particularly with regards to quality of life. Existing research is focused mainly on survival, with limited information about other outcomes. Such information can help in shared decision-making around dialysis initiation; it can also be used to improve outcomes in patients established on dialysis. We used qualitative research methods to explore patient perspectives regarding their experience and outcomes with dialysis.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with participants aged ≥70, receiving dialysis at a regional Australian hospital, were recorded and transcribed. From participants' responses, we identified descriptive themes using a phenomenological approach, with verification by two researchers. Factors affecting outcomes were derived reflexively from these themes.

resultsSeventeen interviews were analysed prior to saturation of themes. Participants (12 on haemodialysis, 5 on peritoneal dialysis) had spent an average of 4.3 years on dialysis. There were 11 males and 6 females, with mean age 76.2 years (range 70 to 83). Experiences of dialysis were described across four domains - the self, the body, effects on daily life and the influences of others; yielding themes of (i) responses to loss (of time, autonomy, previous life), (ii) responses to uncertainty (variable symptoms; unpredictable future; dependence on others), (iii) acceptance / adaptation (to life on dialysis; to ageing) and (iv) the role of relationships / support (family, friends and clinicians).

conclusionsOlder patients experience the effects of dialysis across multiple domains in their lives. They endure feelings of loss and persistent uncertainty, but may also adapt successfully to their new circumstances, aided by the support they receive from family, health professionals and institutions. From these insights, we have suggested practical measures to improve outcomes in older patients.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSelf ConceptAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAttitudeFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSocial ParticipationTime FactorsDialysisElderlyESKDLived experienceOutcomesQualitative researchQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31996167
PMCPMC6988330
OpenAlexW3014012249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.