Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996131›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

A mouse ear skin model to study the dynamics of innate immune responses against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Aizat Iman Abdul Hamid, Laurence Nakusi, Mickael Givskov, Young-Tae Chang, Claire Marquès, Pascale Gueirard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Speciality Grand Challenge for "Biofilms".Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Differential EarlyFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Intravital Multiphoton Examination of Implant-AssociatedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Aizat Iman Abdul HamidLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement, UMR CNRS 6023, Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Laurence NakusiLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement, UMR CNRS 6023, Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Mickael GivskovCosterton Biofilm Center, department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Young-Tae ChangCenter for Self-assembly and Complexity, IBS and Department of Chemistry, POSTECH, Pohang, Republic of Korea.
Claire MarquèsLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement, UMR CNRS 6023, Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Pascale GueirardLaboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement, UMR CNRS 6023, Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France. pascale.gueirard@uca.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5585-4826
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRPohang University of Science and Technology · KRUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Pack Ambition Recherche 2017-Auvergne Rhône Alpes region IMMUNOFILM-Staph project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus aureus is a human pathogen that is a common cause of nosocomial infections and infections on indwelling medical devices, mainly due to its ability to shift between the planktonic and the biofilm/sessile lifestyle. Biofilm infections present a serious problem in human medicine as they often lead to bacterial persistence and thus to chronic infections. The immune responses elicited by biofilms have been described as specific and ineffective. In the few experiments performed in vivo, the importance of neutrophils and macrophages as a first line of defence against biofilm infections was clearly established. However, the bilateral interactions between biofilms and myeloid cells remain poorly studied and analysis of the dynamic processes at the cellular level in tissues inoculated with biofilm bacteria is still an unexplored field. It is urgent, therefore, to develop biologically sound experimental approaches in vivo designed to extract specific immune signatures from the planktonic and biofilm forms of bacteria.

resultsWe propose an in vivo transgenic mouse model, used in conjunction with intravital confocal microscopy to study the dynamics of host inflammatory responses to bacteria. Culture conditions were created to prepare calibrated inocula of fluorescent planktonic and biofilm forms of bacteria. A confocal imaging acquisition and analysis protocol was then drawn up to study the recruitment of innate immune cells in the skin of LysM-EGFP transgenic mice. Using the mouse ear pinna model, we showed that inflammatory responses to S. aureus can be quantified over time and that the dynamics of innate immune cells after injection of either the planktonic or biofilm form can be characterized. First results showed that the ability of phagocytic cells to infiltrate the injection site and their motility is not the same in planktonic and biofilm forms of bacteria despite the cells being considerably recruited in both cases.

conclusionWe developed a mouse model of infection to compare the dynamics of the inflammatory responses to planktonic and biofilm bacteria at the tissue and cellular levels. The mouse ear pinna model is a powerful imaging system to analyse the mechanisms of biofilm tolerance to immune attacks.

Indexed as

SkinStaphylococcus aureusAnimalsBiofilmsDisease Models, AnimalEarFemaleHost Microbial InteractionsMaleMiceMice, TransgenicOtitisStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsBiofilmInflammationIntravital imagingMousePlanktonic formStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID31996131
PMCPMC6990489
OpenAlexW3006029829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.