Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31996125›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

How to study runs of homozygosity using PLINK? A guide for analyzing medium density SNP data in livestock and pet species.

R Meyermans, W Gorssen, N Buys, S Janssens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 376 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R MeyermansDepartment of Biosystems, Livestock Genetics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30 - Box 2472, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
W GorssenDepartment of Biosystems, Livestock Genetics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30 - Box 2472, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
N BuysDepartment of Biosystems, Livestock Genetics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30 - Box 2472, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
S JanssensDepartment of Biosystems, Livestock Genetics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30 - Box 2472, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. steven.janssens@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-3889
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu RT17/1, RT11/5Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1104320NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S37119N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPLINK is probably the most used program for analyzing SNP genotypes and runs of homozygosity (ROH), both in human and in animal populations. The last decade, ROH analyses have become the state-of-the-art method for inbreeding assessment. In PLINK, the --homozyg function is used to perform ROH analyses and relies on several input settings. These settings can have a large impact on the outcome and default values are not always appropriate for medium density SNP array data. Guidelines for a robust and uniform ROH analysis in PLINK using medium density data are lacking, albeit these guidelines are vital for comparing different ROH studies. In this study, 8 populations of different livestock and pet species are used to demonstrate the importance of PLINK input settings. Moreover, the effects of pruning SNPs for low minor allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium on ROH detection are shown.

resultsWe introduce the genome coverage parameter to appropriately estimate F

conclusionsIn this study, we present guidelines for an adequate and robust ROH analysis in PLINK on medium density SNP data. Furthermore, we advise to report parameter settings in publications, and to validate them prior to analysis. Moreover, we encourage authors to report genome coverage to reflect the ROH analysis' validity. Implementing these guidelines will substantially improve the overall quality and uniformity of ROH analyses.

Indexed as

HomozygotePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesAnimalsGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenetic TestingGenotypeInbreedingLinkage DisequilibriumLivestockPetsLinkage disequilibriumMinor allele frequencyPLINKRuns of homozygositySNP density

Identifiers

PMID31996125
PMCPMC6990544
OpenAlexW3014042482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.