Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31995576›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Do genetic ancestry tests increase racial essentialism? Findings from a randomized controlled trial.

Wendy D Roth, Şule Yaylacı, Kaitlyn Jaffe, Lindsey Richardson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Taking an antiracist posture in scientific publications in human genetics and genomics.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wendy D RothDepartment of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2455-7738
Şule YaylacıDepartment of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7701-5962
Kaitlyn JaffeDepartment of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lindsey RichardsonDepartment of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

Sci-Tech Core-Population Dynamics Research CenterP2CHD044964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EMILIO ALBERTO PARRADO · 2018 to 2026
$5.3M
CIHR FDN-154320CIHR MSH 217672NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD044964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic ancestry testing is a billion-dollar industry, with more than 26 million tests sold by 2018, which raises concerns over how it might influence test-takers' understandings of race. While social scientists argue that genetic ancestry tests may promote an essentialist view of race as fixed and determining innate abilities, others suggest it could reduce essentialist views by reinforcing a view of race as socially constructed. Essentialist views are a concern because of their association with racism, particularly in its most extreme forms. Here we report the first randomized controlled trial of genetic ancestry testing conducted to examine potential causal relationships between taking the tests and essentialist views of race. Native-born White Americans were randomly assigned to receive Admixture and mtDNA tests or no tests. While we find no significant average effect of genetic ancestry testing on essentialism, secondary analyses reveal that the impact of these tests on racial essentialism varies by type of genetic knowledge. Within the treatment arm, essentialist beliefs significantly declined after testing among individuals with high genetic knowledge, but increased among those with the least genetic knowledge. Additional secondary analysis show that essentialist beliefs do not change based on the specific ancestries reported in test-takers' results. These results indicate that individuals' interpretations of genetic ancestry testing results, and the links between genes and race, may depend on their understanding of genetics.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanRacismSocial IdentificationStereotypingAdultCultureDirect-To-Consumer Screening and TestingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesWhite PeopleWhole Genome SequencingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31995576
PMCPMC6988910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.