ArticlePloS one2020
Are scientists biased against Christians? Exploring real and perceived bias against Christians in academic biology.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- LGBTQ+ Realities in the Biological Sciences.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- Impacts of Sharing an Instructor's Religious Identity on Students in a Large-Enrollment Introductory Biology Course.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- Recognizing Compatibility, but Hesitant about In-Class Discussion: Nonreligious Biology Graduate Teaching Assistant Perceptions of the Relationship between Religion and Evolution.CBE life sciences education · 2025Article
- The Experiences of Students with Concealable Muslim Identities During Peer Interactions in Undergraduate Biology Courses.CBE life sciences education · 2025Article
- National randomized experimental study finds no evidence of undergraduate bias against LGB biology instructors, even in LGB-unfriendly states.Bioscience · 2025Article
- Toward Culturally Responsive Mentoring of Muslim Research Mentees in the Sciences.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Few LGBTQ+ Science and Engineering Instructors Come Out to Students, Despite Potential Benefits.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Christian Student Experiences During Peer Interactions in Undergraduate Biology Courses.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Unveiling Concealable Stigmatized Identities in Class: The Impact of an Instructor Revealing Her LGBTQ+ Identity to Students in a Large-Enrollment Biology Course.CBE life sciences education · 2022Article
- Students with Disabilities in Life Science Undergraduate Research Experiences: Challenges and Opportunities.CBE life sciences education · 2022Article
- Using the Intended-Enacted-Experienced Curriculum Model to Map theCBE life sciences education · 2022Article
- Christianity as a Concealable Stigmatized Identity (CSI) among Biology Graduate Students.CBE life sciences education · 2021Article
- Hidden figures: epistemic costs and benefits of detecting (invisible) diversity in science.European journal for philosophy of science · 2021Article
- Relationships between the Religious Backgrounds and Evolution Acceptance of Black and Hispanic Biology Students.CBE life sciences education · 2020Article
- A systems change framework for evaluating academic equity and inclusion in an Ecology and Evolution Graduate Program.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Christians are one of the most underrepresented groups in science, and one potential explanation is that scientists have a bias against Christian students, which could discourage and actively prevent Christian students from becoming scientists. Although there is a general perception in society that there is bias against Christians in science, we do not know whether science students, who frequently interact with scientists, perceive this bias. Further, no researchers have attempted to experimentally document the existence of bias against Christians in science. To address these gaps in the literature, we designed three studies. In the first study, we found that college science students report a perceived bias against Christians in science and that evangelical Christians perceive greater bias than Catholic and non-Christian students. Then in two studies, biology professors evaluated Ph.D. program applicants and we examined whether the professors rated a student less favorably when the student revealed a Christian religious identity. We found no statistically significant differences in how biology professors rated a student who was President of the Christian Association compared to a student who was President of the Atheist Association or a student who was President of the Activities Association. However, in Study 3, biology professors did rate a Christian student who went on a mission trip with Campus Crusade for Christ as less hireable, less competent, and less likeable than a student who did not reveal a Christian identity. Taken together, these studies indicate that perceived bias against Christians in science may contribute to underrepresentation of Christians but actual bias against Christians in science may be restricted to a specific type of Christianity that scientists call fundamentalist and/or evangelical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.