Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31995565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A cross-sectional evaluation of five warfarin anticoagulation services in Uganda and South Africa.

Jerome Roy Semakula, Johannes P Mouton, Andrea Jorgensen, Claire Hutchinson, Shaazia Allie, Lynn Semakula, Neil French, Mohammed Lamorde, Cheng-Hock Toh, Marc Blockman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ethnic Diversity and Warfarin Pharmacogenomics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jerome Roy SemakulaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-3333-8502
Johannes P MoutonDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3511-1259
Andrea JorgensenDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Claire HutchinsonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Shaazia AllieDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lynn SemakulaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Neil FrenchDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mohammed LamordeInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Cheng-Hock TohInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Marc BlockmanDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Christine Sekaggya-WiltshireInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Catriona WaittInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Munir PirmohamedWolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Karen CohenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Liverpool · GBInfectious Diseases Institute · UGUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Department of Health 16/137/101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWarfarin is the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant in sub-Saharan Africa and requires ongoing monitoring. The burden of both infectious diseases and non-communicable diseases is high and medicines used to treat comorbidities may interact with warfarin. We describe service provision, patient characteristics, and anticoagulation control at selected anticoagulation clinics in Uganda and South Africa.

methodsWe evaluated two outpatient anticoagulation services in Kampala, Uganda and three in Cape Town, South Africa between 1 January and 31 July 2018. We collected information from key staff members about the clinics' service provision and extracted demographic and clinical data from a sample of patients' clinic records. We calculated time in therapeutic range (TTR) over the most recent 3-month period using the Rosendaal interpolation method.

resultsWe included three tertiary level, one secondary level and one primary level anticoagulation service, seeing between 30 and 800 patients per month. Care was rendered by nurses, medical officers, and specialists. All healthcare facilities had on-site pharmacies; laboratory INR testing was off-site at two. Three clinics used warfarin dose-adjustment protocols; these were not validated for local use. We reviewed 229 patient clinical records. Most common indications for warfarin were venous thrombo-embolism in 112/229 (49%), atrial fibrillation in 74/229 (32%) and valvular heart disease in 30/229 (13%). Patients were generally followed up monthly. HIV prevalence was 20% and 5% at Ugandan and South African clinics respectively. Cardiovascular comorbidity predominated. Furosemide, paracetamol, enalapril, simvastatin, and tramadol were the most common concomitant drugs. Anticoagulation control was poor at all included clinics with median TTR of 41% (interquartile range 14% to 69%).

conclusionsTTR was suboptimal at all included sites, despite frequent patient follow-up. Strategies to improve INR control in sub-Saharan patients taking warfarin are needed. Locally validated warfarin dosing algorithms in Uganda and South Africa may improve INR control.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmbulatory CareAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCross-Sectional StudiesDrug MonitoringFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHIV InfectionsHumansInternational Normalized RatioMaleMiddle AgedSecondary Care CentersSouth AfricaAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31995565
PMCPMC6988943
OpenAlexW3003893050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.