Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31995239›Full record

Trial reportJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2020

Real-Time Energy Exposure Is Associated With Increased Oxidative Stress Among Feeding-Tolerant Critically Ill Patients: Results From the FEDOX Trial.

Liam McKeever, Sarah J Peterson, Sofia Cienfuegos, Jaime Rizzie, Omar Lateef, Sally Freels, Carol A Braunschweig

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liam McKeeverDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6002-2197
Sarah J PetersonDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-5196
Sofia CienfuegosDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jaime RizzieDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Omar LateefDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sally FreelsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Carol A BraunschweigDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3914-0073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProspective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs) that found harm in patients receiving higher levels of energy exposure have been largely ignored, in part because of the lack of a known mechanism of harm.

objectiveThe current 7-day pilot study is a PRCT and post hoc analysis designed to explore the relationship between energy exposure and oxidative stress (as plasma total F2-isoprostanes) in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

methodsThirty-five participants were randomized to receive either 100% or 40% of their estimated energy needs. Our intent-to-treat model found no differences in F2-isoprostanes between groups. A post hoc analysis revealed that on days when participants were in the highest tertile of daily kcal/kg, the real-time energy flow rate within 2 hours of the blood draw was predictive of increased oxidative stress. On these days, participants in the second or third vs the first tertile of real-time energy flow rate experienced a 41.8% (P = .006) or 26.5% (P = .001) increase in F2-isoprostane levels, respectively. This was confirmed through a within-group subanalysis restricted to participants with measurements on both sides of the median of real-time energy flow rate that found a 28.2% F2-isoprostane increase on days in the upper vs lower median of flow rate (P = .002).

conclusionThe benefits of feeding may be more nuanced than previously suspected. Our findings imply a potential mechanism of harm in meeting the current recommendations for nutrition support in the critically ill that warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionHumansOxidative StressPilot ProjectsProspective Studiescritical illnessenteral nutritionF2-Isoprostanesnutrition supportoxidative stressprospective randomized controlled trialsystemic inflammatory response syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31995239
PMCPMC7754354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.