ArticleJAMA network open2020
Association of Simulated Patient Race/Ethnicity With Scheduling of Primary Care Appointments.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Perspectives and Preferences in Lupus Management to Guide Lupus Guidelines Development.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Medicare appointment availability and wait times vary considerably across four large US urban markets.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Breast cancer clustering integrating complete gene expression profiles and genetic ancestry.PloS one · 2026Article
- Trends in kidney and renal pelvis cancer mortality and associated risk factors in the United States.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Mismatch between registration possibilities and patients' local health needs, a simulated patient survey in the Paris metropolitan area.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- Clocking Injustice: Racial Disparities in Specialty Wait Times.Health services research · 2025Article
- Bridging language barriers: Access to primary care for Medicaid Managed Care patients with limited English proficiency in three metropolitan areas.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Exploring disparities in healthcare utilization, cancer care experience, and beliefs about cancer among asian and hispanic cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- The Influence of Racism in Healthcare: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Black Mothers in Chicago.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Assessing Access to Trauma-Informed Outpatient Mental Health Services for Adolescents: A Mystery Shopper Study.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in emergency department transfers to public hospitals.Health services research · 2024Article
- Gender Identity-, Race-, and Ethnicity-Based Discrimination in Access to Mental Health Care.American journal of health economics · 2024Article
- Using Catchment Area Data to Guide a Breast Cancer Health Equity Task Force Efforts in the Heartland.Preventive oncology & epidemiology · 2024Article
- Racial inequalities in mental healthcare use and mortality: a cross-sectional analysis of 1.2 million low-income individuals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2010-2016.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Structural Racism and Lessons Not Heard: A Rapid Review of the Telepsychiatry Literature During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.The primary care companion for CNS disorders · 2023Review
- Medicaid Expansion And Outpatient Cardiovascular Care Use Among Low-Income Nonelderly Adults, 2012-15.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2023Article
- Exploring the complexity and spectrum of racial/ethnic disparities in colon cancer management.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing the Equity of Hospital-Based Emergency Care: The Structure of Hospital Transfer Networks.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- Disparities in Physician Office Visit Wait Time Among Cancer Survivors in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Pediatric Pain and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Implications for Research and Practice in Behavior Analysis.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceRacial and ethnic disparities in access to health care may result from discrimination.
objectivesTo identify differences in the rates at which patients belonging to racial/ethnic minority groups are offered primary care appointments and the number of days they wait for their primary care appointment and to understand the mechanisms by which discrimination occurs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis cross-sectional study used 7 simulated black, Hispanic, and white patient callers to request appointments from 804 randomized primary care offices in 2 urban centers in Texas from November 2017 to February 2018. Data analysis was conducted between February and December 2018. EXPOSURES: Research assistants called randomly assigned offices to schedule an appointment, supplying the same basic information. Race and ethnicity were signaled through callers' names and voices. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Appointment offer rates, days to appointment, and questions asked during the call.
resultsOf the 7 callers (age range, 18-29 years), 2 (28.6%) self-identified as non-Hispanic black, 3 (42.9%) self-identified as non-Hispanic white, and 2 (28.6%) self-identified as Hispanic. Of the 804 calls they made, 299 (37.2%) were from simulated white callers, 215 (26.7%) were from simulated black callers, and 290 (36.1%) were from simulated Hispanic callers. Overall, 582 callers (72.4%) were offered appointments. In unadjusted models, black and Hispanic callers were more likely to be offered an appointment than white callers (black callers, 32.2 [95% CI, 25.1-39.3] percentage points more likely; P < .001; Hispanic callers, 21.1 [95% CI, 13.7-28.5] percentage points more likely; P < .001). However, after adjusting for whether insurance status was revealed, this statistical significance was lost. In adjusted models, black callers were 44.0 (95% CI, 36.2-51.8) percentage points more likely to be asked about their insurance status than white callers (P < .001), and Hispanic callers were 25.3 (95% CI, 17.1-33.5) percentage points more likely to be asked about their insurance status (P < .001) than white callers. Black and Hispanic callers received appointments further in the future than white callers (black callers: marginal effect estimate, 3.650; 95% CI, 0.579 to 6.721; P = .08; Hispanic callers: marginal effect estimate, 2.644; 95% CI, -0.496 to 5.784; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be offered an appointment, but they were asked more frequently about their insurance status than white callers. Black and Hispanic callers experienced longer wait times than white patients, indicating a barrier to timely access to primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.