Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31995182›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2020

General practitioners' provision of end-of-life care and associations with dying at home: a registry-based longitudinal study.

Camilla Kjellstadli, Heather Allore, Bettina S Husebo, Elisabeth Flo, Hogne Sandvik, Steinar Hunskaar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilla KjellstadliDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Heather AlloreDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Bettina S HuseboDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Elisabeth FloDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hogne SandvikNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Steinar HunskaarDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
NORCE Research AS · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOBergen Kommune · NOYale University · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Individualized Absolute Risk calculator For Persons With Multiple Chronic ConditionsR01AG047891 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLORE, HEATHER GWYNN · 2015 to 2017
$990k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) may play an important role in providing end-of-life care to community-dwelling people.

objectiveTo investigate patients' contacts with GPs, GPs' interdisciplinary collaboration, out-of-hours services and hospitalizations in the last 13 weeks of life and associations with dying at home. Second, investigate whether GP contacts were associated with fewer out-of-hours contacts or days hospitalized.

methodsIndividually linked data from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, Norwegian Patient Registry, Statistics Norway and Control and Payment of Reimbursement to Health Service Providers database for all 80 813 deceased people in Norway within 2012-13. Outcomes were analyzed with logistic regression and negative binomial multilevel mixed-effect models.

resultsOverall, 1% of people received GP home visits in Week 13 and 4.6% in the last week before death. During the last 4 weeks of life, 9.2% received one or more GP home visits. Altogether, 6.6% received one or more home visits when the GP had one or more interdisciplinary collaborations during the last 4 weeks, of which <3% died at home. GP office consultations decreased towards the end of life. The likelihood of home death versus another location increased in relation to GP home visits [one home visit odds ratio (OR) 1.92, confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.15; two or more OR 3.49, CI 3.08-3.96] and GP interdisciplinary collaboration (one contact OR 1.76, CI 1.59-1.96; two or more OR 2.52, CI 2.32-2.74).

conclusionsGPs play a role in enabling people to die at home by performing home visits and collaborating with other health care personnel. Only a minority received such services in Norway.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHouse CallsHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPalliative CarePatient PreferenceRegistriesTerminal CareDeath/epidemiologygeneral practicehome visitpalliative careregistriesterminal care

Identifiers

PMID31995182
PMCPMC7377342
OpenAlexW3003867203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.